Message from @Eirshy
Discord ID: 644342956974800928
Plan B is based back in 2012 listen to the lyrics. It even predicted the milkshaking https://youtu.be/s8GvLKTsTuI
A is literally claimining that only B thinks it happened.
@Eirshy that just means that A told D QPQ happened and that others are "vouching"
vouching that A told D
not that QPQ happened
No, B's claim is entirely second hand from C, that's not vouching for A
so.......
A told D that QPQ happened,
and they're saying that B supposedly remembers hearsay that this happened
Supposedly A told D that there was QPQ
B claims that C told him that A said to C that A told D there was QPQ
okay,
so they claim they did it,
and B claims that someone else
said they did it
B claims he heard it from C
who claimed to be he heard it from A
so A is saying everything,
I'm not even 100% that A claimed he said there was QPQ
This is pretty cool for seeming potential low cost and ease of creation
because this could totally be a "it's a lie but if I cover my ass in this way I can't be in trouble for it because I never said it"
and using the "evidence" that they think B knows
that they said this
to say.........
that they said it?
this is just saying "yeah i think this guy, was told by a friend: a friend that i told, what was also told by me to this friend,
which really just boils down to
"I said something"
"Supposedly this guy knows I said something"
"because this other guy knows i said this something"
"and this other guy told him"
"and im using this as evidence that i said something"
"that may or may not be true"
it is barely evidence at all,
Sounds exhausting
and the evidence that it even could be
is just evidence that he claimed something happened
which is useless
Maintaining those neural links would not be my priority