<:ahegao:462286952335671296> <:ahegao:462286952335671296>

@Nat Police raided my place

<:ahegon:566797166258028548>

How is breeding within same race not more inbreeding than breeding with another race? Considering you acknowledge that all races are related, and you ditch pseudosciences like races being created from entirely separate gene stock.

@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck

breh

@MalinaKlaar good

is the coded message that you like dick?

You want the buzz you get the fuz

@whiic
>what is breeding with mixed-race relatives vs breeding with (relatively, if you want to get technical) unrelated members of your own race

https://youtu.be/D1Y3CDkLBK0

@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck How can you have "unrelated" members of your own race... but related member of entirely different race?

How is this possible?

>Dinesh
cringe

@whiic I said RELATIVELY

do you even read, lolicon?

Dinesh "Democrats are the real racists" D'Souza

we're all related in some way

>if you're not fucking a dog, you're inbred

because of a bunch of inbred neanderthals that had sex like 10,000 years ago

or it might have been early Homo Sapiens Sapiens

>(relatively, if you want to get technical)

I woulda just killed the kid on the bus and let the other eat them

If you want to get even MORE precise

https://io9.gizmodo.com/why-humans-are-all-much-more-related-than-you-think-5791530

we have some common ancestor from 2 millennia ago

@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck I still don't get your point in claiming mixed race couples aren't on average more distantly related than people from same race, country or even town.

You just go "not my sister".

If you have kids with your mixed-race siblings

And pretend that it's some binary.

it's more inbred than having sex with a white....10th cousin

@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck

@Monstrous Moonshine It's true, they are.

@Monstrous Moonshine Epstein?