😉

@𝓢𝓸𝓵ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็𝓻 appeal to authority

when you say things like "Q isn't a "conspiracy theory", he's a real group of people
People posting photos from AF1 and the Oval Office" what do you mean?

right there you are qualifying the fact that Q isn't a conspiracy theory because there are photos from AF1 and OO.

then you turn around and try to correct me about my usage of "appeal to authority" you gas-lighter

most of the stuff you post is some sort of referral to a secondary source, which is fine, I gather impressions from various sources too, not putting you down, but I stated already that I am a first hand synthesizer of intel analysis.

that doesn't mean I am always right. for example, Saddam didn't really have WMDs

at least according to public sources

his photos from AF1 and the OO are primary sources

They constitute proof of his identity

A theory is something that isn't proven

right, but you are using those as a secondary source

What does that mean, using primary sources as secondary sources?

you are making a point using facts that you have gathered

As opposed to my own ideas?

RIGHT

sheesh

My own ideas are not called sources

They're called unsourced drivel

Gomer Pyle Gif

right, they only get qualified when someone else produces it

You're speaking a different language from the rest of the world and getting frustrated people don't understand you

If I witness an event, I'm a primary source

My testimony is primary source proof

fine, but we've never got along so I don't expect much

What does it have to do with getting along?

You're speaking a different language from the rest of the world and getting frustrated people don't understand you

You think other people know what you're talking about?

"Primary sources are secondary sources"

"That's appeal to authority non-fallacy"

There are sensical ways to phrase what you're trying to express

i don't have a need to express. I think Orlando understood what I said. I am not claiming I am right.

It has nothing to do with whether we get along. I tell you "For you, Hinduism is perfect, you're not doing anything wrong by being Hindu," and somehow that means I have beef with you, and somehow that beef means I don't "want" to understand you

it's speculation and I said so

Where do you see that @Orlando understood these statements?

when i spoke to him earlier

Understood

You told him Q was appeal to authority from secondary sources and he agreed?

i was lifting weights getting ready for the apocalypse

@Sar quit;

If he agreed with nonsense then maybe he's scared of mods and will agree with whatever mods say