doesn't work that way

men can't do what women can

women cannot do what men can

at least not to the same aptitude and never at the same time

specialization is necessary

that is what specialization IS

certain things are just mutually exclusive

nah

depends

an engineer makes a poor dance instructor

everything depends

never said i would not work with anyone else. hell im not even trained in law outside of my industry. but i am one of those goody goodies who cant lie cheat or steal without looking like a stuck goat

that is an inverse generalization

that doesn't mean an engineer couldn't

team-mates are not partners

You think you should specialise first and then branch out or vice versa?

no, i think you generalize FIRST

poly-math master race.

a good leader knows the job of everyone under his command

he might suck at some jobs but he is at least familar with them

you have to know enough to know what you don't know.

I think you can make progress in a few fields but eventually you'll need to have focus, at least within our current confines.

that familiarity is the only way to discover how to identify who is best at what job

and delegate

you will always have to focucs

Learned through action

a specailist should not be a leader. but a tool in a leaders' tool kit

but that focus is enabled by your teamate

that is the point

if no support, then you MUST be more general

A leader can be a specialisation in and of itself because fuck can it be hard to get people to work well together

the more support, the better you can fill a specific focus

definately

Totally different skill set from whatever you come from before being put in that position a lot of the time

i have met people who are specialists trained to be leaders. most of the time the cause damage ti million dollar machinery

Specialized leaders are shit, seen them drag entire companies into the dirt.

that is afterall how men and women traditionally work together; she priorities and watches the flanks while he specializes on what needs doing

That's because they go from being a nothing to being a leader you need people who work up to that position and who are actually able to learn the skillset rather then some faggot who got trained to lead

that is why i say a good leader is familiar with each job and has a particular specialty

you can't just goto school for 'leader' and expect for that knowledege to replace experience of learning the ropes

"this manager that has worked their way up in the company for the past 10 years versus the harvard graduate..."