Message from @Nathan James 123
Discord ID: 643137408707330087
Lozenge Fair
Because folks like you have equal say in the vote as sane people.
Corporations at least can be started up privately, and whoever is most fit to profit will do so.
Did I do it right
i liked your spelling
imma steal it
<:KingCanuck2:605181694403674152>
@Cryosite you dont have an issue with massive conglomerate monopolies
?
i dont think anyone is pro monoplies
And, not "dominate." As I said, right-leaning. Not fully as right as possible. As little regulations *as is feasible.* I am willing to entertain controls that have merit.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/22293319/
Homos are smart
@livid_scrooge stop trying to make yourself sound smarter homo
Of course not! They don't exist in a free market. @BabaBooey
@Cryosite how about controls on how much wealth a person can attain
personally
great, now weez is here
it seems to have merit that we shouldnt let 1 man for example have 107 billion dollars?
Those sound inherently bad.
Goodie
you are
We've been through this silly billy
Prove it
Why shouldn't we let one man have $107b
😉
having like 15 guys on the planet control the lion shares of the wealth is inherently bad lol
Why?
kek
Any time I see someone post / comment / write about something to the effect of "This tribe and the correlations to intelligence," I basically just treat you the same as a rabid leftist SJW, cuz that's about the level of intelligence you're operating on
i dont have to prove anything, i know, and that is enough
15 jews even worse <:hypersmugon:544638648721604608>
i miss your old pfp, weezo
@Cryosite because centralization of power is bad right? easily corropted you would say?
corrupted
I have no idea what you're talking about 🙂 @Ferris
you should get a jerry pfp
would be fucking hilarious
tell them its just a coincidence
Power will concentrate naturally, and has value when concentrated. I don't see a problem with particular metrics of it. It's something to be wary of, but not inherently bad.