Message from @Jack of Trades

Discord ID: 644330677478621187


2019-11-14 00:15:56 UTC  

Oooh, memory holed...

2019-11-14 00:16:01 UTC  

as well as the bundled cable configuration

2019-11-14 00:16:09 UTC  

for aborbing axial load

2019-11-14 00:16:50 UTC  

because I believe the construction put materials in the building that were set to dissolve the structure when a signal is applied to them

2019-11-14 00:17:08 UTC  

why

2019-11-14 00:17:09 UTC  

DC-9/10 was like a Steudebaker vs a 767 which is like a Prius. The designed for an impact of multiple DC-9's

2019-11-14 00:17:21 UTC  

i beleive it was done in '94

2019-11-14 00:17:31 UTC  

after the first attempt to blow up WTC

2019-11-14 00:17:40 UTC  

@Jack of Trades because they anticipated an eventual economical collapse

2019-11-14 00:17:49 UTC  

a discrete 'fail-safe' to prevent the whole financial district from going under

2019-11-14 00:18:13 UTC  

@Ralin Storm You're missing a step. I want to know why you believe that specifically, not a potential motive

2019-11-14 00:18:25 UTC  

i mean, i myself also remember seeing photos of SAMs they installed under the Pentagon lawn during the 80s

2019-11-14 00:18:36 UTC  

@Jack of Trades the motive is why I believe it though

2019-11-14 00:19:10 UTC  

you can shoot down an inbound Soviet missle.... but not a commercial airliner that corners like a flying brick?

2019-11-14 00:19:18 UTC  

If I were to believe it, it'd be because the construction company purchased some chemical(s) that would dissolve when "a signal" was applied

2019-11-14 00:19:29 UTC  

Or that such a concoction existed and was demonstrated and we could find telltale signs

2019-11-14 00:19:33 UTC  

That's whY I believe things.

2019-11-14 00:19:44 UTC  

What, you think NASA is lying too because they get lots of money?

2019-11-14 00:19:47 UTC  

@ManAnimal the air force was putting on an airline hijacking training mission, intentionally orchestrated

2019-11-14 00:19:54 UTC  

yup

2019-11-14 00:20:04 UTC  

Someone having motive to do something isn't a reason to believe it happened, having the means and some evidence that it might have occurred IS

2019-11-14 00:20:22 UTC  

say nothing for the short-stock of the airlines and the extra insurance granted to the owner

2019-11-14 00:20:32 UTC  

weeks before the attack

2019-11-14 00:20:35 UTC  

@Jack of Trades with the power these people have, evidence disappears

2019-11-14 00:20:49 UTC  

@Ralin Storm You have exactly 3 responses to demonstrate that you're joking or trolling

2019-11-14 00:20:59 UTC  

Goodnyaght everynyan! Rome is civilization

2019-11-14 00:21:00 UTC  

no black box was ever lost prior to 9/11

2019-11-14 00:21:05 UTC  

If you don't, then I am going to banish you from my sight forevermore

2019-11-14 00:21:21 UTC  

no steel building suffered catastrophic failure before 9/11

2019-11-14 00:21:35 UTC  

yet, it happend three times in one day within hours

2019-11-14 00:22:01 UTC  

@Jack of Trades If one had the power to create a building in order to collapse if an economic downfall ever occurred. How does removing evidence such as shipping it off to china seem implausible to you?

2019-11-14 00:22:06 UTC  

also, i used to do survivability tests with JP-5 (jet fuel)

2019-11-14 00:22:33 UTC  

if a carrier made of the same steel can survive such a fire....

2019-11-14 00:22:38 UTC  

@Ralin Storm You could find receipts, shipments, ANY evidence that such a chemical occurs.

2019-11-14 00:22:40 UTC  

You have 2 more.

2019-11-14 00:22:49 UTC  

*occurs/exists

2019-11-14 00:22:57 UTC  

It can't

2019-11-14 00:23:03 UTC  

@TheBrsrkr What can't?

2019-11-14 00:23:13 UTC  

There is a credible concern about the quality of the steel used in the construction of said buildings.

2019-11-14 00:23:14 UTC  

The carrier

2019-11-14 00:23:15 UTC  

Something that just disintegrates when you apply "a signal"?