@TheBrsrkr Depends on if we're in China or not

If China, yes

Lol

@TheBrsrkr the damage I saw from the other side, the building would not have fallen, it would have had debris fall, at most

have you looked at the original engieering drawings of WTC buildings?

there used to be videos of the construction but can't find those anymore

they show the superstructure before the fascade was installed

Oooh, memory holed...

as well as the bundled cable configuration

for aborbing axial load

because I believe the construction put materials in the building that were set to dissolve the structure when a signal is applied to them

why

DC-9/10 was like a Steudebaker vs a 767 which is like a Prius. The designed for an impact of multiple DC-9's

i beleive it was done in '94

after the first attempt to blow up WTC

@Jack of Trades because they anticipated an eventual economical collapse

a discrete 'fail-safe' to prevent the whole financial district from going under

@Ralin Storm You're missing a step. I want to know why you believe that specifically, not a potential motive

i mean, i myself also remember seeing photos of SAMs they installed under the Pentagon lawn during the 80s

@Jack of Trades the motive is why I believe it though

you can shoot down an inbound Soviet missle.... but not a commercial airliner that corners like a flying brick?

If I were to believe it, it'd be because the construction company purchased some chemical(s) that would dissolve when "a signal" was applied

Or that such a concoction existed and was demonstrated and we could find telltale signs

That's whY I believe things.

What, you think NASA is lying too because they get lots of money?

@ManAnimal the air force was putting on an airline hijacking training mission, intentionally orchestrated

yup

Someone having motive to do something isn't a reason to believe it happened, having the means and some evidence that it might have occurred IS

say nothing for the short-stock of the airlines and the extra insurance granted to the owner

weeks before the attack

@Jack of Trades with the power these people have, evidence disappears

@Ralin Storm You have exactly 3 responses to demonstrate that you're joking or trolling

Goodnyaght everynyan! Rome is civilization

no black box was ever lost prior to 9/11

If you don't, then I am going to banish you from my sight forevermore

no steel building suffered catastrophic failure before 9/11

yet, it happend three times in one day within hours

@Jack of Trades If one had the power to create a building in order to collapse if an economic downfall ever occurred. How does removing evidence such as shipping it off to china seem implausible to you?

also, i used to do survivability tests with JP-5 (jet fuel)

if a carrier made of the same steel can survive such a fire....

@Ralin Storm You could find receipts, shipments, ANY evidence that such a chemical occurs.