But hilarious

@D Two Hands, my response to that statment is that the conclusion is less important than the ability to utilitize evidence to make a definitative evaluation of what occured

MA any thoughts on the thermite cutting explanation? Those 45 degree angles are awfully strange

yeah, those aren't natural occurances

@D Two Hands Wasn't enough thermite residue

Fair point. Its a solid exercise in deductive skill and thats always good

There was enough in line with the materials of the drywall that would be similar though.

One reason someone might conclude that, but the simpler explanation makes way more sense.

the 45 degree angles only indicate SOME type of controled demolition

what they used is rather irrelevant

A freak thermite-esque reaction doesn't cut like thay though, it would leave holes not angles

Many things can be true at once:
Bin Laden organized and perpetrated 9/11
9/11 was not an inside job
The government is lying about 9/11
There are things we don’t know about 9/11

Thermite isn't explosive, it burns hot

All of that can be true at the same time.

@D Two Hands you are correct.

again, my personal opinion was that the buildings were rigged with a fail-safe after the '94 attack

@Scale_e You are correct.

@Scale_e and for some reason, people block you and attempt to lie about you in order to have you banned if you talk about just 1

the gov had evidence an attack MIGHT occur but no idea when

@ManAnimal this shit has been planned for a very long time

either a select few pulled the trigger knowing those precautions existed

@ManAnimal pearl harbor wasn't the first

Why a failsafe? The buildinga wouldnt have collapsed without the controlled demo so what is gained by that?

or it was a group taking advatange of an oppurtunty

@ManAnimal a group that set us down a path involving the american dollar

i mean, does anyone remeber trying to make a cell phone call in an airplane in 2001?

you got nothing but static

Basically impossible yes?

yet, all those phone calls

quantum entanglement, it exists

And how is QE relevant?

how can you make those phone calls on planes now?

not impossible, but also not consistent with the technology at the time

point is that it was either A) deception or B) incompetance

https://youtu.be/taa26IVpP4o?t=673

That's one curious fact

if the gov/military cannot stop a bunch of men in a cave flying commerical airlines, then we have been spending all this money to stop a soviet attack for nothing

One acto of good hearted rivalry brought two companies a lot of fame and business

As opposed to just court battles nobody would care about

either way, THEY FAILED to protect the country. Why should we trust them again?

@Uksio there is no competition anymore. The only advancement being done is in private and in government. Which I don't trust