no it's a reality by virtue of technological progress dictating that this is what a state needs in order to stay competitive

You must very well know that capital concentration can be offset by lowering the entry requirements for an industry, right?

Just get back to the old ways by stripping down unnecessary regulation.

even if you lower the entry requirements you still have economies of scale to deal with

Which was put there by lobbyists at the first place.

And even in the economies of scale you can have competition.

Why there are Microsoft and Mac and Linux?

yes but you will also have capital concentrated into a centralized body, necessarily entailing the concentration of political power

Why there are Coca Cola and Pepsi?

Shall I continue?

I don't think that capital concentration should equal political power concentration.

it's not about should

The people can offset the process.

i don't think they can offset it anymore than in the short term without systemic change

If they are conscious enough of the ways Big Business is trying to buy legislation offering it protection.

in the long term political power is always used in service of propertied interests

control over resources is the primary determinant of political power

I don't think so.

the only possible exception would be in situations where such a high degree of formal power is invested in an authority that they can overcome it

The ultimate root of all power is violence.

as in a place like nazi germany

Politically motivated violence at that.

I don't want it to become a Starship Troopers discussion but that's the reality of it.

i mean, that is true, though i think that these things are roots in different ways

And violence is ultimately garnered by the people, not by the property owners.

in general there are acts of violence that are considered to be legitimate and those that aren't, and the legitimacy of violence is generally dictated by those who control resources, but of course it is possible that they can be overthrown if enough people see the violence they sanction as being illegitimate and use their own violence to overturn the system that upholds their rule

If you get the people to use this fundamental capability of theirs against the property owners they just can't compete.

in the long term it only matters insofar as one uses it to affect systemic change though

Now you are getting it @Death in June

if you leave the same power structure intact it will ultimately begin to act according to the same incentives it did before

If there is a large body of ARMED, and I stress the word, citizens out there who are ready to sanction anyone disregarding their values, no amount of property can save you.

As Mao said it:

Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.

That is why the globalists are so afraid of the AR-15 bunch in the US.

the idea that control over resources is the primary determinant of political power isn't incompatible with the idea that a paradigm of control over resources can be overthrown through extralegal violence

Don't allow corruption to settle in your political institutions and no amount of wealth will be worth the risk of messing in state affairs.

"Don't allow corruption to settle in your political institutions"

It is actually what is going wrong with the West right now.

you may as well tell us to eat the sun

Too much hedonism.

Nope, actually there are many examples of societies in history which managed to get rid of corruption in one way or the other.