if they want to set up a company, they're free to do so

I want as many people possible spending money in the American market

Plus if u add a clause like that people will just start fake shit to get land

And is it all types of companies

there are plenty of ways to invest that actually bring some value.
Instead of basically being like gold that takes up a lot of valuable space.

Do crypto’s have value?

In ur opinion

yall don't know value investing until you study ben graham

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2019/oct/01/donald-trump-news-today-impeachment-polls-live-latest-updates-ukraine-australia <:thinkgon:560211224923734026>

https://edition.cnn.com/2019/10/01/politics/donald-trump-impeachment-democrats-rudy-giuliani/index.html

So, they finally wanna do it?

I also like this page

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Efforts_to_impeach_Donald_Trump

Look at the timeline <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

When you realize that the Democrats are seriously behind financially then the impeachment proceedings make a lot more sense. https://ballotpedia.org/Party_committee_fundraising,_2019-2020

There needs to be a "stonks" meme for political fundraising.

Man, the people in <#598799722324688927> are fucking weird

Heh. Gee, I wonder why.

How many of them are probably Nazis?

Like 1488 (((they))) style /pol/ type Nazis.

I mean, just go look at the chat over there

Nah. More like extreme tardlets and autists.

That's possible

Some climate zealot on Reddit the other day called me a "boomer-brain" and a member of a "denialist clan"

Kek.

Just goes to show how tribal people can get.

I thought it was funny that he associates "climate denial" with Baby Boomers only

Just because I don't agree with the lefties' idea of how to combat climate change, doesn't mean I deny it is a thing (and that humans have played a hand in it).

We know it's a thing, there's hard data to back it up from multiple independent sources. It's just a matter of what we do about it. I for one support grassroots efforts, not this mad rush toward socialism.

The science is murky

The climate has been warming since the end of the Little Ice Age

It's also possible that, if the Industrial Revolution hadn't happened, the Little Ice Age could've become a real one.

That's more a hypothesis, though.

All I was saying is that in John Cook's "consensus" meta-study, that only 0.5% of the papers reviewed claimed that human activity made up the majority of the influence on warming

That's actually a much smaller percentage than the ones that said we had no effect at all

Fair enough. The degree we've influenced it is up for debate, true. But we're not exactly "killing" the planet.

The vast majority of the papers either didn't mention it, or fell in the 1%-50% range

Anyway, that was enough for him to start raging on me

Which is dumb of him.

Indeed

It's actually a really interesting subject