I mean we've got you will need 71 more

As I said if you want to believe you can, but the moment you take it out of your door (including online) be ready for someone to call out that bullshit <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

But religious people *are* defective for belieiving in something by their own admission they cant prove its existence, as are the mentally insane who say they hear voices

Being wrong =/= being defective

Could you tip your fedora any lower

I'd rather phrase it as people have a right to voice their opinion or belief, just as much as someone else has the right to respond.

Not nearly as defective as devout atheists.

not that either of these rights are under unscrupulous attack at the moment, regarding religion

opinions on borders and immigration though are a different story

plenty of fights going on about that

or at least most of them claim

Furthermore stating that something does not exist because it is not observable is not exactly a valid argument atoms were not observable until very recently that does not mean they did not exist till very recently. We merely had no way of observing.

That is true they can voice their opinion as he has done, and I voiced why his beliefs are questionable, and you all voiced you didn't like that <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

No I was asked what I believe I said I believe X because Y and you sat there typing prove it

I voiced that you're being an impish cunt about it

No one said atoms absolutely existed until we saw them- that is entirely different from your god dude

We can prove their existence

I voiced I am not require to justify myself to you unless im trying to preach which I am not

Accurate. I would say "an impish cunt *with shit arguments*" but that's me.

Actually you're wrong the Greeks hypothesized that atoms existed long b4 we could observe them

Impish? Is Ben Shapiro Here?

Link that claim <:pepe:312704217028493312>

His Wife's Boyfriend's Girlfriend is a Doctor

http://sciencenetlinks.com/lessons/history-atom-ancient-greeks/

His name was Democritus you can find it in any science history textbook

5th century BC

Should check yourself before you wreck yourself Bud

Trump did an oopsy

Do share

Choosing to keep quiet on Hong Kong during the trade deal

Like

Donald, this is your leverage

That was a mistake honestly the British never should have let it go

THIS IS THE KIND OF THING YOU USE TO GET A FAVORABLE

Actually, Hong Kong is technically British

China broke their end of the deal

Well the brits lease did expire

my knowledge on hong kong ends after the second opium war where it was ceded in perpetuity to the british

I wonder where storin went

and seemed to remain that way through such times as the tai ping rebellion and rise of the communist party

I wonder if you got tired of me or maybe he had nothing to say to that particular argument or maybe he was embarrassed about getting a science history lecture from a defect like me