That's not very Socialist... That's *Feudalist!*

So they *are* trying to become Princesses...

Yes sorry miss spelling, what is also interesting is that these areas refuse to provide ethnic census data

And guess what Diana abbot does for her London area <:thinkcummunism:462305204877131786>

***HEIL!!!*** She heils her Chairman Corbyn. That's what.

Well it kind of is socallist since they are the only party that will get voted in those areas. Im simply using Fiefdoms as a simply example of what they are like

You can't really vote in a Feudal Society either.

Labor wants to be Noblemen, and they want their constituents to be Serfs.

~~Also Sadiq Khan wants to be King, so he can declare himself Caliph of England.~~

@Eccles well it won't happen mate since which ever party offers it and gets people in a loop for housing demand will leave it in place, it's simple realpolitik

@Ankha yeah pretty much can't say ought agasint that

@Ankha I don't think that is really true, I don't believe Labour have bad intentions in that way they are just going about helping working class people the wrong way

I'd prefer social housing to tax payer money being paid to private landlords

Left wingers are cancer that produce tummors and to remove tummors you cut em out or kemo the cancer

No they are not

Yes

They are the ones that originally fought for Free Speech in the first place

I really don't care at this point

What you are talking about is parts of the Modern Left not the Left overall

Noam Chomsky is a good example of a good modern day left winger

And when I say left wingers I should be more specific in that I'm referring to the left wing intersectional coalition

At this rate, Labor isn't any good for the population.

They are in some ways

There's an old song that Lorde sang, but Tears for Fears did right the first time.

***EVERYBODY***

Any socialism is also cancer as it is mearlly a stepping stone for communism

They are just a slightly more radical social democratic party

***WANTS***

***TO***

***RULE***

***THE***

***WORLD.***

Socialism is not necessarily a bad thing provided it is done in a limited sense

At this rate, at this time, Labor has lost its purpose, and is nothing more than a cancer upon British Society. if it wins, it'll spread to the rest of the Anglosphere.

Therefore, let's not argue in favor of the regenerative capabilities of a Massive Tumor.

We elected radical Labour back in the 40's and we survived

We could do it again

Or not, because they've lost their purpose.

Clement Attlee was very radical for Labour, Strongly supporting Nationalisations and Welfare systems

They have become corrupt, authoritarian, and are a waste of votes.

@Eccles when I also say social housing I don't mean housing built by the government I mean as in housing for people to buy eh mortgage or rent out