6 hours ago

Still using the No Extension rhetoric

If he knew he had to extend he would have started going back on this by now

https://www.ft.com/content/01572204-e6a0-11e9-9743-db5a370481bc

divorce plans leaked

he will seek if no deal by the 19th

I need to be a subscriber to read that, But i don't think he will

really? it worked fine for me

anyway

If he knew he had to extend why would he keep up that rhetoric of No Extension?

It doesn't make sense from an optics point of view

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7537149/Boris-Johnson-faces-court-showdown-Article-50-extension.html

It just makes him look unreliable

Well of course he told a court that

boris is insiting but court says other wise

now its law binding

I think he will technically follow the bill but will find a way around it

That allows us to leave

Boris may go to jail if he seeks no extension

cause of scottish courts

So?

top bants

no pm

He can just become a martyr for the cause

then you may get a remainer in

We will already be out

courts rule the land unfortunately

Or he could try to invoke the Civil Contingencies act

This is the one time in which i would really like the PM to have dictatorial power

indeed i would too

but he wont/cant

courts over rules even bias'd wamen scottish ones

The courts are wrong

Legally

I don't know for sure, But is there a law to overrule the Supreme Court if they have made a decision which is wrong legally due to political bias

By precedent the prorogation for starters was Legal

if only that law can be enacted

Frm my understanding the supreme court is the highest legal authority in the UK since they abloished the Law Lords. When they unlawfully exceed their remit there is only one court higher, ECHR.

lol

what a sad state of affairs

But Parliament can just repeal or make legislation that is contradictory to the court.