Message from @Nathan James 123

Discord ID: 631155645218816020


2019-10-08 15:45:15 UTC  

*Typical remainers*

2019-10-08 15:45:38 UTC  

Merriam-Webster definition.

2019-10-08 15:45:55 UTC  

You don't think some of these Q2 issues are to do with the delay?

2019-10-08 15:46:02 UTC  

Seen as we were growing fine until then

2019-10-08 15:46:07 UTC  

As per the definition, King Remainer is correct.

2019-10-08 15:46:12 UTC  

Fucking shit server, can't post images

2019-10-08 15:46:19 UTC  

I think it's more likely to do with us cutting ourselves off from our BIGGEST FREE TRADE MARKET

2019-10-08 15:46:38 UTC  

Nathan, I literally just posted the growth figures

2019-10-08 15:46:39 UTC  

2016-march 2019

2019-10-08 15:46:42 UTC  

Don't matter tho

2019-10-08 15:46:43 UTC  

Got you

2019-10-08 15:46:51 UTC  

2015 1.4%

2019-10-08 15:46:54 UTC  

Their GDP is virtually the same and has been since 1992

2019-10-08 15:46:55 UTC  

2012 1.5%

2019-10-08 15:46:55 UTC  

We were still growing then

2019-10-08 15:46:59 UTC  

nathan

2019-10-08 15:47:03 UTC  

It's just fluctuated up and down

2019-10-08 15:47:03 UTC  

growth of 1-2%

2019-10-08 15:47:07 UTC  

Look at the evidence I've shown you.

2019-10-08 15:47:12 UTC  

Look at it PeP.

2019-10-08 15:47:12 UTC  

is better than our current growth of fucking nothing

2019-10-08 15:47:17 UTC  

Im looking

2019-10-08 15:47:19 UTC  

at the fucking

2019-10-08 15:47:21 UTC  

GDP right now

2019-10-08 15:47:24 UTC  

Zoom out.

2019-10-08 15:47:27 UTC  

Click the 'max' button

2019-10-08 15:47:33 UTC  

I don't CARE about 20 fucking years ago

2019-10-08 15:47:35 UTC  

See what their chart looks like?

2019-10-08 15:47:43 UTC  

It's not relevant

2019-10-08 15:47:43 UTC  

>Their economy has virtually been the same since 1992

2019-10-08 15:47:46 UTC  

>I don't care about that

2019-10-08 15:47:48 UTC  

Hur dur

2019-10-08 15:47:51 UTC  

yea

2019-10-08 15:47:55 UTC  

They're DE FACTO not growing.

2019-10-08 15:48:04 UTC  

Excuse me for thinking th elast 5 years are more important than looking at growth 20 years ago

2019-10-08 15:48:07 UTC  

When you look at a larger trend.

2019-10-08 15:48:21 UTC  

When you actually look at MORE evidence, you see your statement doesn't add up.

2019-10-08 15:48:24 UTC  

What

2019-10-08 15:48:26 UTC  

you're not even

2019-10-08 15:48:27 UTC  

making a point