When you actually look at MORE evidence, you see your statement doesn't add up.

What

you're not even

making a point

In terms of GDP they're virtually stagnant.

You're just saying that

BUT

THEY

ARE

NOT

And Japan is doing fine.

THEY ARE GROWING 1-2%

THATS NOT STAGNANT

WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE TREND

THEY ARE FINE

LMAO

It could be argued that despite the current GDP growth of Japan, due to it's fluctuations of increasing and decreasing it has become stagnant.

However, as per the definition, currently they have a growth.

End of story.

Do you understand what trends are?

I dont get how you don't undrestand the difference between 0 GROWTH, and 1-2% GROWTH

They are DIFFERENT numbers

Since 1992, their economy hasn't significantly grown from their current GDP size.

do you understand this?

Do you understand this?

You're both right and are arguing for no fucking reason.

King you are arguing a point Nathan isn't making

Do you understand that since 1992, their GDP has basically stayed the same.

I didn't even

bring up jana

He is talki g about a trend over time

japan

Vice versa right Joshu?

BUT

NO ONE EVEN

Over this trend, it has gone up and down. But their economy is BASICALLY STAGNANT.

BROUGHT IT UP

When looking at the trend.

This is all fucking deflection

So "Stagnant economies are AWEFUL"

Isn't really true.

So, when is this chat going to be used for <#622430298746912768> ?

He brought up Japan so he set the topic and point he was making.