Message from @Nathan James 123

Discord ID: 632586148602183690


2019-10-12 13:55:50 UTC  

This was surprisingly interesting, here are my results if anyone else would like to give it a go.

2019-10-12 14:19:38 UTC  

@4SidedTriangle A pacifist nationalist?

2019-10-12 14:20:08 UTC  

We will defeat you with kindness, objective justification and Reasonability!

2019-10-12 14:20:17 UTC  

I'm pro defence, anti aggressive wars

2019-10-12 14:22:14 UTC  

It is weird though I am pro-national service for those out of work, training or education and those commuting crimes as an alternative to prison time. Plus I am pro trident and want to increase the percentage of GDP spent on the military once the deficit is cut.

2019-10-12 14:23:38 UTC  

@Mavalance isn't that the Canadian way, and how many wars have they lost? (obligatory screw Trudaeu)

2019-10-12 14:25:48 UTC  

The Political Compass is better

2019-10-12 14:26:12 UTC  

Ehh, not really

2019-10-12 14:26:17 UTC  

Politiscale is better

2019-10-12 14:27:10 UTC  

>I appear to be quite authoritarian

2019-10-12 14:29:09 UTC  

🤢

2019-10-12 14:29:39 UTC  

If they are worthy enough

2019-10-12 14:29:45 UTC  

Then i don't see why not

2019-10-12 14:30:05 UTC  

They aren't which means the requirements are dropped. Which means lower quality personel.

2019-10-12 14:30:08 UTC  

Only 17% of people voted for the "yes, as long as they pass the same tests as men"

2019-10-12 14:30:11 UTC  

😦

2019-10-12 14:31:01 UTC  

They certainly shouldn't be in the army in front-line service.

2019-10-12 14:31:16 UTC  

I don't know why lowering the standards for women is even an option

2019-10-12 14:31:30 UTC  

(((Diversity)))

2019-10-12 14:31:43 UTC  

People in high stress scenarios tend to behave badly

2019-10-12 14:31:51 UTC  

Especially emotional women.

2019-10-12 14:31:58 UTC  

We don't need front line pregnanices either.

2019-10-12 14:32:03 UTC  

During WW2, the women were sent to support the army by being in other roles. Nurses are one such role

2019-10-12 14:32:04 UTC  

Nor front-line relationships

2019-10-12 14:32:13 UTC  

That's not front-line combat @Mavalance

2019-10-12 14:32:17 UTC  

I know

2019-10-12 14:32:30 UTC  

Their requirements ARE different during the training and examinations.

2019-10-12 14:32:34 UTC  

which is why i suggest that they be sent into other ways to support the army

2019-10-12 14:32:39 UTC  

They ARE tested to a lower standard

2019-10-12 14:32:41 UTC  

as not every role is front-line

2019-10-12 14:33:31 UTC  

Netherlands really wants a EU army, don't they?

2019-10-12 14:33:49 UTC  

@Nathan James 123 how very Authoritarian of you.

2019-10-12 14:34:03 UTC  

Exactly as that scale says 😉

2019-10-12 14:40:54 UTC  

the last thing i read was that they had an 80%+ rejection rate for the physical tests

2019-10-12 14:41:39 UTC  

more like 90% actually

2019-10-12 14:42:21 UTC  

The physical tests i do believe should be the same put on those who are men. It should extremely gratuatous and difficult. Yet my thinking does lead me to believe that there is a path of strength women can take that does not have to be the same as men. It just hasn't been found yet.

2019-10-12 14:43:00 UTC  

The S.A.S has an extremely low entrance rate. around 7%. Not everyone should be able to get into these branches

2019-10-12 14:46:23 UTC  

"The S.A.S has an extremely low entrance rate. around 7%."