"not performing normally"

No that's not dysfunctional

Norm, not norm, that's not what makes it so

Einstein wasn't normal, he was perfectly functional

it had a purpose though in times where malthusian traps were more relevant

i mean, arguably

it's just a hypothesis

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/dysfunctional

"not performing normally, as an organ or structure of the body; malfunctioning."

No drive to do the very normal thing of, reproducing.

So yes, dysfunctional.

A dysfunction is when a) the species or b) the individual breaks down because of it

Or both

The definition provided says otherwise

Though, agrees with B

To an extent

that definition is terrible

Homosexuality is an individual thing

I wonder, would the holocaust have happened if America had magically sided with Germany in ww1?

A working agreed-upon definition that more people use than yours.

If I perform 1000 times better than everyone else, then I don't perform normally either

Sorry.

Hell, if America and Germany won

It's still a shit definition

The ussr might not have happened 🤔

Disagree tbh

Ok then explain

If you can think 1000 times better than everyone else

Are you dysfunctional?

That definition covers a wider range of scenarios than yours does.

Idc

Like the one you're describing right now.

Answer the question

according to one alt history scenario if germany won then france and the uk would have become syndicalist :^)

That would make them not "normal".

Which fits my definition

It would not fit yours.

Does it makes them dysfunctional though?

"not performing normally"

Yes.

They're outside of the norm.

Is it dysfunctional to be able to think 1000 times better?

@Death in June you mean Kaiserreich I'm guessing?