>Thinking voting matters

>Democrat

<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

do abstain from voting?

Voting needs to be heavily restricted

To those earning over a certain amount of money and over a certain age.

Possibly to those with college level education and above as well.

Certain age yes 18

Money no

Age, 21.

Education no

King Remainer vibes here

The problem with restricting sufferage is no one will vote to remove their own. If you want to curtail it you need phases

You just want to gerrymander the votes in your favour

Money, yes. Poor people don't care about strategic aims like the rich

There should also be a maximum voting age

Education, probably THE most important one.

Right so don't give the poor a say

Why do we want stupid pepple voting?

Good way to cause violence

Fuck education

What other way do they have to speak up

Educated people are idiots, I know from experience

If legally they have no voice

"Good way to cause violence", not if they're constantly working all day.

They can't save up money and can't afford to protest.

Else they go homeless

*Put the poors to work for a poor wage so they shut up*

De facto the system we have now

This isn't PeP vibes

No PeP is liberal

This is PeP 2: Victorian age boogaloo

But yeah. Restricting sufferage based on education encourages massive University structures we deffintely don't want

College level is the standard education level

@Nathan James 123 are you forgetting all of history, peasant revolts are a recurring theme there nathy boi

The buisness/land owning method of the old us makes more sense

IE, people that stay in education until 18.

But no nathan

We arnt gonna yeet back to pre 1918

@killerqwerty The current day isn't history. Poor live infinately better lives than peasants of the past

Oh boy, people need to stay in state run education for 18 years to vote... I see no flaws with this plan