Message from @Borzo

Discord ID: 577119016229928973


2019-05-12 13:02:35 UTC  

@ApplicationBot don't fall for it

2019-05-12 13:02:40 UTC  

Just block him and move on

2019-05-12 13:02:45 UTC  

?

2019-05-12 13:02:54 UTC  

He just wants attention

2019-05-12 13:03:02 UTC  

well, thanks for rubbing that in, sure i dont know all variables, but if you would have those and dont have a bias you can have 100% perfect science

2019-05-12 13:03:02 UTC  

we are discussing

2019-05-12 13:03:12 UTC  

He doesn't discuss

2019-05-12 13:03:15 UTC  

borzo is biased

2019-05-12 13:03:17 UTC  

ok theoretically yes

2019-05-12 13:03:19 UTC  

Nazis can't discuss

2019-05-12 13:03:21 UTC  

but then there's the paradigm

2019-05-12 13:03:37 UTC  

why havent i blocked you yet borzo?

2019-05-12 13:03:37 UTC  

and after that there's base assumptions

2019-05-12 13:03:58 UTC  

you van have perfect vabase assumtions

2019-05-12 13:03:59 UTC  

I've already blocked you, so go ahead @Deleted User

2019-05-12 13:04:09 UTC  

well, what are those

2019-05-12 13:04:20 UTC  

what even is an assumption

2019-05-12 13:04:22 UTC  

lmao

2019-05-12 13:04:23 UTC  

@Borzo says he blocked me in response on the so called blocked msg he dindt read 😄

2019-05-12 13:04:30 UTC  

what is language that creates an assumption

2019-05-12 13:04:55 UTC  

Just because you're blocked doesn't mean I can't read your messages

2019-05-12 13:05:06 UTC  

One quick tap and then I can read it then close it

2019-05-12 13:05:09 UTC  

we;;

2019-05-12 13:05:16 UTC  

Gives me the choice on whether you're worth my time or not

2019-05-12 13:05:17 UTC  

assuption is not certain its a assumtion

2019-05-12 13:05:34 UTC  

so you need to taak scienece and find out if those assumtions are correct

2019-05-12 13:05:45 UTC  

to get 100% accuracy you need to know all the varrbles

2019-05-12 13:06:09 UTC  

Like you are not worth my time any more borzo

2019-05-12 13:06:24 UTC  

i didnt block you as you show that you are at least a half wit

2019-05-12 13:06:33 UTC  

well

2019-05-12 13:06:40 UTC  

godel's incompletness theorem

2019-05-12 13:07:15 UTC  

sure but that stems from the assumption that the scienece is done by flawed beings

2019-05-12 13:07:19 UTC  

also science works withing naturalism only

2019-05-12 13:07:26 UTC  

if that's wrong then its all wrong

2019-05-12 13:07:27 UTC  

who dont have knowledge of all the varrables

2019-05-12 13:07:56 UTC  

how would you go about doing science of consciusness

2019-05-12 13:08:07 UTC  

if you prove it doesnt come from the brain

2019-05-12 13:08:12 UTC  

or god

2019-05-12 13:08:53 UTC  

i would compare scienec with 100% rational thought, knowing the varriables

2019-05-12 13:09:18 UTC  

some ppl just think more scientifically and logically

2019-05-12 13:09:51 UTC  

mainly due to the ability to grasp and analise the many varaiables at the same time to draw a conlusion