Message from @T. Raven
Discord ID: 604077137212997633
Please at least learn your logical fallacies.
let me correct
But my point still stands.
using winning a war as strawmen to the ecconomics not being effected by the regime change is retarded
They at the same time were starving, but also fought off a European Empire under the control of Germany.
How is that a point
How is that relating to ecconomics being effected in other ereas
you are dense.
And wining that war was done by simply killing tons of russians
What you said does not make sense.
And the two points cannot coincide with each other.
It is not a point to ecconomics being effected to the point of starvation
what does a single famine have to do with the country "falling"
not only that as a strawmen it doesnt even works as they got massive suplies from the alied with out they would have lost
That there is somehow enough people in Russia to both starve to death AND fight off literally most of Europe invading them.
Single famine
lmao
yes
who said single?
There were more then one
there was like 1 major famine
ow so theer were more then one
nice of you to backpeddal on that
where did you imply there were multiple
all of which killing ppl causing ecconomic collaps
the economy didnt collapse
if ppl are dead they dont contribute to gdp
and not ujst that
russia is dead and done for gutted for these past 80 years
Yeah have to agree with Raven that you jumped around on several points. From Rothschilds, to famines, etc. I mean we can talk about them all we want.
And saying the ecconomy did not collapse is kinda silly considering the decline of standards of living
you can keep a ecconomy "ip" whilst murdering the country
it is done all teh time
you bring in wiing world war and im the one jumping ariound?
so it didnt collapse?
>russia is dead and done for gutted for these past 80 years
Well on Russia thing they nearly voted back their communist party twice, the Clintons had to intervene with Yeltsin to save his ass.
did i used the word collapse
yes
any way 14 million ppls ecconiomic contribution collapsed