like it has nothing to do wuth what i djust said

>Wining a world war or not is strawmen

That's literally not what a strawman even is.

Strawmen is when i put words into your mouth.

Please at least learn your logical fallacies.

let me correct

But my point still stands.

using winning a war as strawmen to the ecconomics not being effected by the regime change is retarded

They at the same time were starving, but also fought off a European Empire under the control of Germany.

How is that a point

How is that relating to ecconomics being effected in other ereas

>How is that a point

you are dense.

And wining that war was done by simply killing tons of russians

What you said does not make sense.

And the two points cannot coincide with each other.

It is not a point to ecconomics being effected to the point of starvation

what does a single famine have to do with the country "falling"

not only that as a strawmen it doesnt even works as they got massive suplies from the alied with out they would have lost

That there is somehow enough people in Russia to both starve to death AND fight off literally most of Europe invading them.

Single famine

lmao

yes

who said single?

which other famines

There were more then one

there was like 1 major famine

ow so theer were more then one

nice of you to backpeddal on that

where did you imply there were multiple

all of which killing ppl causing ecconomic collaps

the economy didnt collapse

if ppl are dead they dont contribute to gdp

and not ujst that

russia is dead and done for gutted for these past 80 years

Yeah have to agree with Raven that you jumped around on several points. From Rothschilds, to famines, etc. I mean we can talk about them all we want.

And saying the ecconomy did not collapse is kinda silly considering the decline of standards of living

you can keep a ecconomy "ip" whilst murdering the country

it is done all teh time

you bring in wiing world war and im the one jumping ariound?

so it didnt collapse?

>russia is dead and done for gutted for these past 80 years

Well on Russia thing they nearly voted back their communist party twice, the Clintons had to intervene with Yeltsin to save his ass.