>is actually a Zionist

Remind me again what free democratic election put Stalin in power? Where was the freedom of speech. Freedom of press. Think you’ll be free under Communism. Oh boy just wait

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1937_Soviet_Union_legislative_election

When its nationalist to shill against one of the states that advocates for nationalism and self determination

https://jucheireland.wordpress.com/2017/02/26/on-having-a-correct-understanding-of-nationalism-kim-jong-il/

While supporting a literal imperialist power that creates puppet states and crushes nationalist movements

😎 👌

didn't stalin try to resign like 4 times

*everyone and everything I don’t like is zionism* I hate Zionists as much as the next guy but come on get a grip

Sounds about right for you.

You can’t just say they are free elections because they are elections. Anyone with a brain knows they are just a ceremony nothing more

>You can’t just say they are free elections because they are elections

https://8ch.net/leftypol/res/2265496.html

Get back to our dprk thread anon

each kim had a different position

More Democratic then the USA with more parties that are in government.

For that matter kinda has an edge on the anglos too.

The people who wrote the definition are retards then

Yes but If they are all communist parties then it’s not free elections. Free elections require the people the choice to vote out the communist part of they choose

Like in Poland in 1987

You can’t bash Gorbachev for holding actual free elections but then claim the soviets or North Koreans held free elections

>free elections

<brags about killing people and how you will have war and nationalist government with implied no free elections

Oh so now your all for democracy

>implying parties = political representation

You just need to elect people no? Was it not Washington himself who said something to the effect that parties were dangerous and undeeded?

>You can’t bash Gorbachev for holding actual free elections but then claim the soviets or North Koreans held free elections

Most wanted the USSR back

in fact they the Russian people almost voted it back twice until the Clintons intervened

both times in Yelstin's elections

>political parties = democracy
literally read Gaddafi's Green Book

yeltsin didn't even take power democratically

1993

Russian's thought they were keeping the USSR, then Gorby was LMAO nope yeet

there were riots in the street defending the soviet union

one fire one nail in north korea

But they didn’t. Hitler almost took Moscow but he didn’t. Saying something nearly happened doesn’t mean it would have happened. That’s not how logic works

>But they didn’t.

LMAO the people did not get to choose which was the point

Btw the position Kim Jong Un holds isn't even the head of state or anything

You really do belong in the special ed room don't ya?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fcd4EFRKSy8

funny thing is too and you may like this

Kim Jae Ryong holds the highest position of Prime Minister, lol

if you try to look up the clintons and the russian yelstin election

>tfw people go from talking about traps to talking about yelstin

you isntead get results on the autistic trump shit

I could post a link to the battle of cable street but that doesn’t mean that Britain actually supported Germany

https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-meddling-in-1996-russian-elections-in-support-of-boris-yeltsin/5568288