>implying an entire mode of production cured polio rather than a smart individual

how anti individualistic of you

^this

>My side versus your side it’ll be a rather short war

Your side shoots up garlic festivals (mostly of white people) and has killed more white people then any one could hope to imagine.

I thought capitalists valued the individual

I guess not, lol

I’m a nationalist

So a capitalist

Different to capitalists

Ok

No, no their not

Nationalist can be sided with anything, but 99% of the time its captilaism

You support private ownership of the means of production so ye youre a capitalist

then you become a whore to business

which needs you to bomb the brownies then import them

and then you have autistic fights on some chat server

wondering where your problem in life is

😎 👌

"no im a feudalist"

>is actually a Zionist

Remind me again what free democratic election put Stalin in power? Where was the freedom of speech. Freedom of press. Think you’ll be free under Communism. Oh boy just wait

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1937_Soviet_Union_legislative_election

When its nationalist to shill against one of the states that advocates for nationalism and self determination

https://jucheireland.wordpress.com/2017/02/26/on-having-a-correct-understanding-of-nationalism-kim-jong-il/

While supporting a literal imperialist power that creates puppet states and crushes nationalist movements

😎 👌

didn't stalin try to resign like 4 times

*everyone and everything I don’t like is zionism* I hate Zionists as much as the next guy but come on get a grip

Sounds about right for you.

You can’t just say they are free elections because they are elections. Anyone with a brain knows they are just a ceremony nothing more

>You can’t just say they are free elections because they are elections

https://8ch.net/leftypol/res/2265496.html

Get back to our dprk thread anon

each kim had a different position

More Democratic then the USA with more parties that are in government.

For that matter kinda has an edge on the anglos too.

The people who wrote the definition are retards then

Yes but If they are all communist parties then it’s not free elections. Free elections require the people the choice to vote out the communist part of they choose

Like in Poland in 1987

You can’t bash Gorbachev for holding actual free elections but then claim the soviets or North Koreans held free elections

>free elections

<brags about killing people and how you will have war and nationalist government with implied no free elections

Oh so now your all for democracy

>implying parties = political representation

You just need to elect people no? Was it not Washington himself who said something to the effect that parties were dangerous and undeeded?

>You can’t bash Gorbachev for holding actual free elections but then claim the soviets or North Koreans held free elections

Most wanted the USSR back

in fact they the Russian people almost voted it back twice until the Clintons intervened