Message from @Cantwell
Discord ID: 614987872650526752
If the former is true why can't we apply that to any tribal in 50,000 BCE where they didn't have those linguistic or social structures for that
Wait you're saying the highly intelligennt person wouldn't be able to use language?
so yeah point is, iq has nothing to do with the worse treatments blacks recieve during police interactions
How?
what do you mean how?
@Cantwell i didn't say that at all, I said that a incapability to apply certain linguistic structures and words in place to COMMUNICATE those ideas affectively
that doesn't mean they can't use that language
but that they might not be able to think outside those mind shaping concepts
at least not to the point where they can communicate their ideas
That generally doesn't happen outside of extremely high IQ people
Communication has nothing to do with IQ though
that's the point though and it's more than communication, it's that IQ can't account for those factors that have always been historically important for technological advancement
IQ is very important to technological advancement
also linguistic incapability
or underdeveloped languages and linguistic capability is very important factors in why neolithic humans weren't super geniuses that caused the space age to happen in their 30 year life time.
and IQ isn't important to technological advancement historically or now, I think it's ludicrous to suggest that IQ has measured why technological advancement happened.
Genetics haven
't determined those thigns.
things*
Very open minded
no i'm saying the next steve jobs didn't need a super duper IQ because like his historical counterpart wasn't effective in introducting in technological advancement but instead using his social skills to sell products and be effective in marketing
plus i'm saying IQ as a measurement doesn't even really matter, or exist as a effective one, it's near fake, just a abstraction of human imagination.
Steve Jobs wasn't successfull because of social skills
Literally what
what are you talking about, he never made technological advancement happen
he didn't invent anything
the only reason why we know him is because he took the work of "intelligent" people in the field of computer science and Information technology
and sold it
he marketed, he made businesses, and he was effective in doing both, that's what made him rich
This entails a degree of intelligence
wealth doesnt eqate to intelligence
Very good marketers have a certain IQ
It's not just "social skills"
ok so intelligence is what than again? you say you need a certain IQ but IQ tests don't even measure that
often times its a matter of luck, and oppourtunity
IQ test measure language capacity
wow impressive thesis, IQ measurements measure linguistic structures and the capability to use them
and not the other way around
They do measure the ability to use them