Message from @Lehi Avraham Stern
Discord ID: 614988533928558603
but that they might not be able to think outside those mind shaping concepts
at least not to the point where they can communicate their ideas
That generally doesn't happen outside of extremely high IQ people
Communication has nothing to do with IQ though
that's the point though and it's more than communication, it's that IQ can't account for those factors that have always been historically important for technological advancement
IQ is very important to technological advancement
also linguistic incapability
or underdeveloped languages and linguistic capability is very important factors in why neolithic humans weren't super geniuses that caused the space age to happen in their 30 year life time.
and IQ isn't important to technological advancement historically or now, I think it's ludicrous to suggest that IQ has measured why technological advancement happened.
Genetics haven
't determined those thigns.
things*
So basically you think the next Steve Jobs will have an IQ of 80?
Very open minded
no i'm saying the next steve jobs didn't need a super duper IQ because like his historical counterpart wasn't effective in introducting in technological advancement but instead using his social skills to sell products and be effective in marketing
plus i'm saying IQ as a measurement doesn't even really matter, or exist as a effective one, it's near fake, just a abstraction of human imagination.
Steve Jobs wasn't successfull because of social skills
Literally what
what are you talking about, he never made technological advancement happen
the only reason why we know him is because he took the work of "intelligent" people in the field of computer science and Information technology
and sold it
he marketed, he made businesses, and he was effective in doing both, that's what made him rich
This entails a degree of intelligence
wealth doesnt eqate to intelligence
Very good marketers have a certain IQ
It's not just "social skills"
ok so intelligence is what than again? you say you need a certain IQ but IQ tests don't even measure that
often times its a matter of luck, and oppourtunity
IQ test measure language capacity
wow impressive thesis, IQ measurements measure linguistic structures and the capability to use them
and not the other way around
They do measure the ability to use them
i'll tell you now, no that isn't true, and that IQ measurements work under the capabilities of their language and linguistic overlords, as IQ comes from those things
so trying to say IQ can not be applied under the things their applied under is not possible, and again IQ doesn't measure that either
yes and that article before I even read that does not probably mention IQ
and now you are trying to tell me IQ does represent intelligence once again
which i've already disagreed with,
The article about genetics and IQ doesn't mention IQ?