Message from @trizzz
Discord ID: 616438208632324097
then why aren't you
Just admit you're a meme dude
Bye yall Im gonna humanize myself with my little lions
too much effort
right
so u have no source
You literally are stuck in 5th grade or something where they say this shit all the time about academic .edu and .org
Or you're just too dumb or know so little you can't make your own decisions or read things by yourself
Lol
Or maybe you shouldn't believe internet hoaxes?
I'm lean towards the second one
Actually use SCIENTIFIC studies?
You know, if you are struggling with non biased english sources, you could learn another language.
this is full of citations and scientifc sources
Post the scientific sources and citations
not the biased article
If we posted Buzzfeed it'd be retarded of us.
"What we call the “left”, which I don’t know if it’s even appropriate to call them that anymore, has managed to pull off a great trick. And that trick is to convince people l…"
a very professional scientific source
I'm not going to scroll through every article and post the sources that are already hyperlinked in it and explained
dude are you fucking retarded?
Post the important studies then.
did any one consider that the white ppl were the orginial ones
Burden of proof lies on you.
No read it yourself
It's not a long read
and the tibetans gained the slanted eyes and dark skin over time
hyperboreans came first @Deleted User
@Deleted User Depends on what you define as a "White person"
white persion is broad
Greece may have been the hypothetical birthplace of humanity but early skeletons proved Dark Skin was dominant early on.
cuacusoids are white by american immigration standards
Although the slanting is clearly later on.
the second one is physical anthrpology books
Lieberman 1992
now if you look closely, you may notice that these axes are mislabeled
Time to research.