The graphic explained:
In 2010, German households had the lowest net median wealth of the Euro zone.
Graphic:
First section is about the distribution of wealth (in thousand euros per household): middle blue = average, red = median
Second section: light blue = amount of house owners
Third section is about the pre-tax income (in thousand euros per household): 1) median income, 2) average income

Your name implies you read German but I suspect you don’t. Fortunately, Facebook now has a search function for timelines.

I read a little. I am trying to improve.

The embarassment of a Wehrmacht fanboy.

Foreigners always assume Germans are filthy rich. Some pseudo refugees already went back when they realised they don’t get a house, a car, and a well paying job immediately.

When right-wingers attack a refugee home, they do it before people move in to make sure nobody moves in.

The median wealth in Germany is half that of the European average, am I reading that correctly?!

Most attacks on refugee homes from the stats are in fact performed by refugees for various reasons, for example when the pudding isn’t so tasty or the wifi signal is bad. I’m not kidding, in both cases the refugee homes were ruined.

@Deleted User , in 2010. It’s getting worse and worse.

What are your politics?

Over a decade ago the so-called Social Democrats implemented their Agenda 2010 which could have been written by Margaret Thatcher.

@Deleted User , you as in mine?

Are you a Socialist?

I’m a transhumanist communist: I want communism to reign over the whole planet, so that we won’t waste resources on superfluous struggles anymore and can put them all into scientific advancement.

Why specificially transhumanism? Scientific Advancement can come from unexpected place

s

I’m particularly excited that progress is made in the field of computer tech which will, hopefully, eventually be made completely of biological compounds which will make it far easier to merge with technology.

I agree that the human form is not sacred.

It’s flawed on many levels.

I read is historical materialism that "Social progress is driven by progress in the material, productive forces a society has at its disposal"

Productive forces including technology

Indeed, most can be automated, performed by machines.

In the USA, for example, there is already a law firm that wants to handle many lawyer’s tasks by bots which will reduce the costs tremendously.

It stands to reason that the more humans are like technology, the faster the social progress.

Also, the case of the AI working together who have created an own computer language to facilitate communication amongst them.

Capitalism hols us back because people must be kept worrying about how to survive everyday.

@Tenta he likes the idea of stressing people.

Yes, because under capitalism society has less productive forces overall, as they are collected by the ruling class only.

@Firefly , whom do you mean?

@Tenta your new fascist friend.

That is? Maybe I’m a bit slow now. I don’t feel stressed right now.

Fast transformation can be stressful.

See

I like fast. It was predetermined.

And why should I feel stressed?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyO_-oDtvGU German song praising Lenin as the great moderniser of technology and society.

Wow, that’s a cute version, and even with an English translation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEZJXI-IQS4

When the Quantitative change is predictable, Qualitative change is stressful. If you don't think it is, then the Quality isn't changing enough.

https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1938/09.htm

The 'you' of yesterday is not the 'you' of today or tomorrow.

@Tenta What do you think? Should change come faster or slower, or it doesn't matter?