Social liberalism: 🤢

no u

Social communism: 👌

i keep getting democratic socialist

@★ Commissar Regi ★

garbage

Kek

This is good. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eOmPewjgO48

>materialism

>2017

>not having enough so you want to steal it

>helping someone else steal it for you only to have it denied again but you do nothing because he holds a title you admire

That's a cute caricature. Would you care to summarise your argument?

Summary: Communists are fools lead on by greed rather than necessity

Copy & Paste retort incoming

I'm sure it appears that way from your point of view where everything is reduced to greed. Marx's idea was that revolutions were inevitable, regardless of the motivation.

I argue not of the philosophy of Marx I argue of communists.

Fascism is also in accordance with the idea of revolutions yet I don't see many people here siding with it

What do you call a 'communist' who does not understand Marx? A traitor.

Yes, some revolutions result in a new form like Fascism. I am quite familiar. I was unironically a Fascist for several years.

Maybe still am. I am new to Marx.

>new form like fascism

>fascism is a political form

Fascism was a reaction to Communism and the first world war.

Fasces, a bundle. It isn't about politics nor economics fascism is supposed to be the base of human civilization via an organic, shifting state

That utilizes its many forms to create a perpetual and unbreakable machine

What you're thinking of are reactionaries, monarchists, and capitalists

We will have to wait and see. You say Fascism is greater than its fruits, I say the same for Communism.

You understand the double standard.

<:trumpW:246055765687795713>

#too large

Anyhow I'm not saying fascism is "greater than its fruits". It's much the same of the communist's desires, the difference being that fascism doesn't bother with menial matters such as attempting to bend nature to force true equality

There's an end goal but the end goal is limitless, much like the Marxist revolution

If that makes any sense

Why shouldn't man be molded into a higher form?

Of course man can, this is part of the progression of nature. Evolution is inevitable

So then if Marx predicts man will evolve in a certain way, a better way, a provides a guide to this form, Communism, what is so 'bothering' about that?

>Marx invented communism

A suggestion isn't a postulation of inevitability.