Message from @Blebleh
Discord ID: 314516585836576768
It requires people to force it upon others
If there is no such people than it is not imperialism.
It is forced with the state
DEATH TO THE LEFT
imperialism isn't a program alone as let's invade countries
it emerges from the conditions of capitalism, it requires a monopolist capitalism which was restored with Khruschev, and therefore he had to obey that kind of economy
no matter how much he tried to be good
like reforming capitalism in social democracy, it's limited
@Blebleh I disagree on this. USSR has been most socialist country in the world.
Even after Stalin.
I could agree
but most socialism now is welfare state
still capitalism
even some people criticize stalin as capitalist
because he couldn't remove the capitalist relations of production (for this we would need world socialism)
but if there's no bourgeoisie... it seems leftcom to me
So my point is Idiots are not necessarily imperialist.
A country being imperialist or not doesn't depend on idiocy or intentions
and call them idiots
but still imperialism
Subjectivity is important. There is no subjectively imperialist = there is no imperialism.
China and Russia today can defend Syria
but it's still an imperialist bloc, just one with interests against the national bourgeoisie of the US and Europe
yes, so I say, every try to help other nations is for the national bourgeoisie not for socialism
it obeys the logic of capital not proletarian internationalism
@Blebleh There was no national bourgeoisie in power in USSR under Brezhnev.
Only revisionist scum
If you would trade openly for profit you would go to prison.
Even if you sell a cigarette
What kind of class of bourgeoisie in power is that?
It's almost like it's just a bunch of economic D&C
That can't possibly be, can it? I are all the facets of socialism just veils over a death cult?
Stalin denounced the cult of personality
And yet...
if something it was permitted
we have to know the melting point of the policies and they have heads