Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 316014688020332554


2017-05-22 00:41:58 UTC  

@Firefly Why do you wish this situation on me?

2017-05-22 00:42:20 UTC  

@Blebleh Whatever structure you set up after revolution has to be authoritarian in order to prevent regression back to the old state.

2017-05-22 00:42:33 UTC  

@Blebleh because you are too stubborn to learn.

2017-05-22 00:43:59 UTC  

@Deleted User Ah, with reactionaries; but they're the ones wanting to imposing us as I said, we're liberating ourselves

2017-05-22 00:44:15 UTC  

I know Engels say it's authoritarian, but I disagree; violent yes

2017-05-22 00:44:32 UTC  

@Firefly Haha, why?

2017-05-22 00:44:50 UTC  

@Blebleh you tell me why

2017-05-22 00:45:00 UTC  

@Blebleh So you only are about yourselves? That is not a complete strategy. Where ever capitalism exists in the world, it will try to destroy you. What will be your response?

2017-05-22 00:45:31 UTC  

@Deleted User Anarchists propose defending the revolution, we would do it

2017-05-22 00:46:39 UTC  

@Blebleh You will defend yourself? What, without a professional army or centralised command?

2017-05-22 00:47:01 UTC  

@Deleted User Yes there can be an army

2017-05-22 00:47:27 UTC  

Somebody who doesn't learn will face result of his action. Democracy is a lie. You shall face the results of this illusion.

2017-05-22 00:47:37 UTC  

@Blebleh Anarchists will start an army command structure and it will be libertarian! Now I have heard it all.

2017-05-22 00:47:55 UTC  

@Firefly Bourgeois democracy is a lie

2017-05-22 00:48:11 UTC  

You will be crushed.

2017-05-22 00:48:18 UTC  

@Blebleh proletarian democracy is also a lie.

2017-05-22 00:48:30 UTC  

@Deleted User Yes, the thing is that it's conscious, the state means monopoly of violence

2017-05-22 00:49:01 UTC  

people has weapons; although I'd discuss that we could need a central "police", which wouldn't be libertarian

2017-05-22 00:49:10 UTC  

combining them

2017-05-22 00:49:29 UTC  

@Firefly Not mine

2017-05-22 00:49:32 UTC  

>central "police"
>anarchism

2017-05-22 00:49:38 UTC  
2017-05-22 00:49:39 UTC  

yes

2017-05-22 00:49:43 UTC  

That's why I said it wasn't libertarian

2017-05-22 00:49:47 UTC  

that we could need it

2017-05-22 00:50:03 UTC  

@Blebleh So you are willing to make concessions according to necessity?

2017-05-22 00:50:13 UTC  

@Firefly Why do you say this?

2017-05-22 00:50:28 UTC  
2017-05-22 00:50:43 UTC  

@Deleted User But in this precisely, and the people still have guns

2017-05-22 00:50:45 UTC  

@Blebleh because it never worked and it shouldn't work.

2017-05-22 00:51:05 UTC  

@Blebleh Then that is the only slippery slope I need. The world necessitates authority.

2017-05-22 00:51:12 UTC  

@Firefly But it worked

2017-05-22 00:51:27 UTC  

@Blebleh when?

2017-05-22 00:51:40 UTC  

@Deleted User I don't hold it as dogma, the situation could need it or not, I don't know yet

2017-05-22 00:52:05 UTC  

@Blebleh Good chat.

2017-05-22 00:53:14 UTC  

@Blebleh that is a map of failed actions.

2017-05-22 00:54:01 UTC  

The same I could say for the USSR

2017-05-22 00:54:07 UTC  

and there are the zapatistas

2017-05-22 00:54:33 UTC  

@Blebleh and I agree about USSR

2017-05-22 00:54:40 UTC  

then all is failed XD