Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 317102745469321217
You can't get around that.
Unless you reshape man's urges.
you have to kill man to reshape is urges
either by the soul or by the sword
<:caring:312066184948350976>
the urge dies only with the man
Are you saying his urge to trade objects of value is eternal and unchanging?
As a son will offer his mother his pacifier.
As a mother will offer her breast
as a father will offer meat and shelter
I'm afraid it's neurologically inherent.
What is so special about this inherent behaviour?
Evolution is a 'just in time' process.
It's how we survived in groups as prey animals for what looks to be seven million years.
I don't buy that, fully about evolution because im aware of epigenetics and epiproteomics
i know what it can and cannot do.
This is also why I am forced to reject Darwin;.
which cost me lots of friends
Do I say anything about genes not being about to turn on or off?
its in the implication of JIT evolution
^ this is where we deadlock
evolution is the reference standard.
we cant change it, and we ought not to direct it
not on a whole species, or even macro-cultural level
Evolution builds on previous generations. Which is why there is such thing as an evolutionary dead end. You cannot undo or radically transform. This lack of flexibly makes it imperfect. If you were to manipulate evolutionary pressures on a species you could make it extinct.
That's a reflection of your own vulnerability. It's adapt or die no matter the cost or circumstance. That's how evolution makes decisions. You don't get to change that by arguing however eloquently it's imperfections.
I don't get to ignore it in my analysis if i deem it 'imperfect,' _THAT_ is pure ideology.
What do you mean, 'you don't get to change it'. Of course you do. It is inevitable.
you dont get to change the decision making method of evolution
Ah, that's true. But you can manipulate genetics.
It is vastly unwise to do so.
Do you have a good reason not to?
It's at once too complex and too misunderstood to apply with any certainty of outcome.
We will probably disagree here, but i've worked in genomics for a while now.
and while i ought not to appeal to authority
or declare myself an expert
my personal opinion is a gigantic well researched no
But you can understand, 'it's just too complex' is almost verging on luddite tier rebuttal.
which is my eternal disappointment with the determination