Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 317111489649704961
this will progress through a second pass at proteomics and some of thsoe things created legit super soldiers
it's foolish to try now, as a matter of personal caution, but if you care nothing for the divinity of man, then go right ahead
So humans can be changed, with selective breeding, or radical experimentation. Why is man sacred?
That's a philosophical question that marx will talk you out of as I answer it.
Seek elsewhere for that question.
I am not a dogmatist. Try me.
Really you are saying man's urge is sacred.
Not that it cannot be changed.
^ this. Yes
In the purely phenomenological sense, the nature or urge of man is a compulsion from an unknowably complex and long running process.
Yes we, through this divine urge, change the nature of man, but in doing so we break the link with divinity.
It is my opinion that this divinity is a wiser entity than you.
Or I. Or we.
Or the worker.
This is a regressive perspective. It doesn't matter if the process is better than anything we can imagine. What matters is that this may not be true forever. Why shouldn't we start now on our path for future mastery? Why are you motived to hamstring yourself, when you do not know all possible outcomes? This is anti-intellectual and Luddite tier.
How is it even possible to recognise that an origin (if that is even possible) is Absolutely perfect and thus its process today still is?
Hardly. My disconnection from the divine wisdom of Marx is that I feel he is wrong in his analysis of the divine urge.
It is in das kapital that he fucks this up
"I feel", "My opinion"
I don't even need to cite chapter and verse, because it's all rubbish.
Lmfao
I learned that from map
Mao
Well the mao2 model drones
My point is, from my perspective the socialist direction is a misdirection of otherwise intelligent people into a form of slave religion.
1) Prove there is an Absolute origin
2) Prove that this origin is perfect
3) Prove that the process from the origin is perfect
4) Prove that mankind can never reach this level of perfection
>materialists
🚁
Not an argument.
You demand proofs of the ethereal
What is 'ethereal'?
What else is there to do but provide fifteen seconds of socialist perfection
Existence is dependant on proofs, fam.
RUSH HEAD FIRST INTO UTOPIA, innit?
Got a better idea?
I don't buy that thesis at all.
Yes. Several. First of all stop wasting good intellect on a philosophical garbage can
Secondly, stop moaning about the system and use it wisely.
Thirdly, gain enough power and experience to effect real and wise change.
Do you always reassure yourself with such vagueness?