Try again. desu

First you read. You learn. Then you do criticism.

Not the opposite.

You're doing it wrong.

You've no idea what I've done.

Again, your perspective is platitudinous

VERY LOW RESOLUTION PERSPECTIVES

@OF-8 You didn't read anything. You are twitter generation.

...is this your materialist perspective of the situation, or is the little collectivist buttmad

you cannot be logical in this statement

it has to be buttmad

@OF-8 I asked what books of Marx did you read?

I did not answer.

So you've assumed none.

How platitudinous of you.

@OF-8 Yes.

People assume things.

Well, the very unsmart ones tend to assume the wrong things recusively.

And here we arrive at the 🚁 protocol

@OF-8 So which books did you read?

Irrelevant.

@OF-8 Reading books is relevant.

I reject marx fully and we do not need to discuss it in more detail

Pretty much to everything.

as i reject his forethought

the entirety of post-modernism is cancer

@OF-8

that doesnt mean i havent investigated the cancer a little

but again, its irrelevant.

marx != books

smarter people who were not marx also wrote books

@OF-8 You don't know what you fight against. Would be scary if I were you.

You're firm in this assumption that I don't?

@OF-8 Yes.

Can we give me the charitable gift of assuming i somehow do

@OF-8 Impossible.

So sayeth the dogmatist.

So shall it be.

^_^

>criticizing the dogma

wew lad