I did not answer.

So you've assumed none.

How platitudinous of you.

@OF-8 Yes.

People assume things.

Well, the very unsmart ones tend to assume the wrong things recusively.

And here we arrive at the 🚁 protocol

@OF-8 So which books did you read?

Irrelevant.

@OF-8 Reading books is relevant.

I reject marx fully and we do not need to discuss it in more detail

Pretty much to everything.

as i reject his forethought

the entirety of post-modernism is cancer

@OF-8

that doesnt mean i havent investigated the cancer a little

but again, its irrelevant.

marx != books

smarter people who were not marx also wrote books

@OF-8 You don't know what you fight against. Would be scary if I were you.

You're firm in this assumption that I don't?

@OF-8 Yes.

Can we give me the charitable gift of assuming i somehow do

@OF-8 Impossible.

So sayeth the dogmatist.

So shall it be.

^_^

>criticizing the dogma

wew lad

@OF-8 people like you do not read.

@ShadyMarxist have you ever read a book called flatland?

I blow through 2 books a week when im busy

I don't read retarded shit tho

unless im doing like a ...ideological investigation

there's two kinds of reading you know, reading for funsies and reading to figure something out

@OF-8 You have to read from a lot of different sources.

Marxist too.

the ideological investigation is ususally the latter, so i might pour over the related materials of an ideology over the course of several weekends

this lead me to investigate marxism as a child of post-modernism

this always makes the post-modernist reeeeee

Recently Ive re-opened the post-modernism case files and this place is a kind of source