Message from @Firefly

Discord ID: 318677117401563136


2017-05-29 08:48:36 UTC  

First we need the onse who do not follow.

2017-05-29 08:49:20 UTC  

It is hard to get them by convincing. Requires book writing and such.

2017-05-29 08:51:26 UTC  

It is easier to convince when you play for keeps, not chatter on the internet with no skin in the game. I will focus on myself.

2017-05-29 08:51:33 UTC  

I think it is much harder to build the core of a Party than to do mass propaganda.

2017-05-29 08:52:06 UTC  

Masses will follow. If there is someone to

2017-05-29 08:53:08 UTC  

It is in the nature of the masses

2017-05-29 08:53:12 UTC  

To follow

2017-05-29 08:53:52 UTC  

I think you are right. I still have lots of reading to do. Are you interest in trying to build the core of a Party?

2017-05-29 08:56:36 UTC  

That is what Proriv journal does. I'm not sure where is equivalent in the West. Maybe American Labour Party. But they are American and disorganized. Every western organization I've seen so far is against discipline and is very sectarian/individualistic.

2017-05-29 08:57:15 UTC  

CPGB (ML) maybe a good starting point

2017-05-29 08:57:30 UTC  

But I'm in the states.

2017-05-29 08:58:46 UTC  

I think it is best to start a new organization really.

2017-05-29 08:58:50 UTC  

In the west

2017-05-29 09:02:20 UTC  

I have been watched videos produced by CPGB ML. It has good information but they have a strong focus on recruiting more members. In my country there is no good ML groups either.

2017-05-29 09:02:40 UTC  

Where is it?

2017-05-29 09:03:00 UTC  

What country?

2017-05-29 09:05:40 UTC  

@Deleted User I think CPGB ML passed through many shifts. I think it was twice they purged many and re-established pure ideology. If they target more people right now it might be OK for them.

2017-05-29 09:08:01 UTC  

In Australia.

2017-05-29 09:08:29 UTC  

@Deleted User Very unlucky.

2017-05-29 09:08:57 UTC  

Move to Europe, USA.

2017-05-29 09:09:05 UTC  

For politics.

2017-05-29 09:09:55 UTC  

It would be a shame such intelligence rot in Australia.

2017-05-29 09:10:06 UTC  

I would not rule it out. After I finished reading Fundamentals I will decide if I will be a Marxist or not.

2017-05-29 09:10:33 UTC  

It is not a decision.

2017-05-29 09:11:21 UTC  

If you decide on it you are not Marxist from the beginning. It is a process of arrival to conclusions.

2017-05-29 09:12:41 UTC  

I had a hard time becoming Marxist because of idealist concept. It was very hard to break it.

2017-05-29 09:16:39 UTC  

I made no such decision before I even started. I wait for more information to see if the theory is reasonable enough to take further. I need to make a decision at some point. I think I will know after I have read all the basics.

2017-05-29 09:17:36 UTC  

decision on what? It does not require a decision. I didn't decide to become Marxist.

2017-05-29 09:18:35 UTC  

I was hardcore idealist.

2017-05-29 09:18:44 UTC  

My difficulties are also idealist. Absolute, dogmatic and mystical thinking, as a response to stress. I guess the illusion of a decision is also idealism, but letting go of it.

2017-05-29 09:19:16 UTC  

And the consequences of idealism hit me so hard I'm still not fully recovered.

2017-05-29 09:20:20 UTC  

So it is not a decision. If it for me to decide I would stay idealist.

2017-05-29 09:20:51 UTC  

I say try your idealism hard to shatter it.

2017-05-29 09:21:36 UTC  

That seems radical, but interesting.

2017-05-29 09:21:39 UTC  

It worked for me.

2017-05-29 09:21:56 UTC  

Not without breaking bones.

2017-05-29 09:22:11 UTC  

But it worked.

2017-05-29 09:22:19 UTC  

Better option is reading books.

2017-05-29 09:23:17 UTC  

My dirty secret is that I have a soft spot for Islam.

2017-05-29 09:23:53 UTC  

@Deleted User Islam is a great way to control masses indeed.

2017-05-29 09:27:43 UTC  

What consequences of hardcore idealism did you find?