Circuses.

Etc.

a central planned economy doesn't require trade

Sorry. No. The naturalistic behavior of man disagrees with Marx. Marx is wrong.

The whole philosophy collapses right here.

@OF-8 what are trade proxies created through trade

no, I don't trade

the naturalistic behaviour of man isn't trade; I disagree with this

A trade proxy "I don't like fish, but group c loves fish, fish is a value proxy for group c trading"

That's capital asshole.

communism doesn't equal absolute egalitarianism

so why does someone not finding utility value in fish prove communism wrong?

The naturalistic behavior of man is to give objects of value willingly.

*facepalms*

It proves Marxian capital theory wrong

.... no?

And communism collapses without it.

communism respects desires

Look this is my position.

explain your understanding of marxian capital

I don't need to convince you.

i expect you to be able to defend your position

you don't understand marx

My analysis is better than yours. Get on my level or get memed.

god i wish i could pin this

he's at the level of the austrians making straw mans of Marx with the theory of subjective value

this has already been addressed by marxian economists

bawerk is the only austrian to come even close to an effective critique, but it too ultimately fails

I'm leaving crucial stuff out of the theory so you can figure it out.

Dismiss it at your peril, brainlets.

>i can't defend my own ideology because *you're* so stupid

🤷🏼‍♂️

nice

equating it to egalitarianism is not reading a single text

>notice me senpai

Lmfao

and Cockshott already addressed all the problems of Mises and Hayek

*Joke's on you, I was only pretending to be retarded*

>resolve my cognitive dissonance senpai

the fact that people still take mises seriously makes me want to drop out of my econ degree and hang myself

Econ is a fuckin meme.