Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 324814046228643840
How do you know this
Assumption?
I can assume things too
Your mind is a first-person ontological perspective, but it experiences God because the Design has come up with the experience of God
I can assume scientology
We're made in his image
His image
Oh you are?
How do you know?
I arrived at it through logic
Explain the logic
Without any assumptions
I want 0 assumptions
Explain.
Direct knowledge from God is not an assuption, it's 100% fact. It's a superfact even, greater than all other possible knowings. <:troll_king:312064227542040576>
You can't start logic without assumptions.
I think Jeff is just trollijg
Let's take the number 12 for example.
Does it exist?
Let's assume that it does.
Yes it exists as an idea
but we are the sons of god and the kingdom of god is with in us and the father the sun and the holy spirit is with in us, so does that mean god is just us and that the idea of god is a internal thing we use to help us explain our humanity and its being stated in plain as fuck metaphorical language and anyone that doesnt notice it might as well be from the fucking dark ages
Okay, what is the number 12?
🤔
An idea to describe an amount
I say it exists more than an idea.
When it's 12 o clock, it's literally actually 12 o clock, in the external world.
Time is a social construct
We've been through this
You can't just say something isn't real just because it's constructed.
So okay, we have the number 12. It's real. It exists. We use it to attach meaning to quantities, time, and to operate within the framework of reality.
Answer this: if direct knowledge of God was given to you, could you use your understand of reason to prove it?
what would direct proof of god be
Jeff What makes your assumptions better than mine?
Let's say I assume Tengri exists
What's your response?
@Deleted User Deep prayer, hesychasm.
I say that's a nice religion. Good for you.
oh so faith based un-provable things