I could say much of the same as leninism and communism.

Only they did not succumb to war but popular demand.

That's nice. But you can appreciate the different realities which Communism and Fascism exist. Communism has historical merit, always pushing into a new revolution as proved how to do by the past, Fascism got steamrolled and is trying to somehow reinvent itself in a new world. There is a difference.

If you want to get techical, you could call the reign of ceasear in the roman empire a fascist one, and 20th century fascism does have historical merit, as it managed to revitalize the failing economy in germany, and united people to take territory that their claimed, while they were not successful in doing so, they managed to conquer and spread at possibly the fastest rate seen in history.

(You have to give them merit for how they managed to get past the maginot line in france, and how they managed to grow at an extremely rapid rate.)

If you want to play history, you should look at Historical Materialism, which predicts that Communism is the future of all human social relations. It seems your theory simply cannot compete, and in my experience this is true, being an ex-Fascist myself. it is child's play/

History can play out in spectacular and unbelieveable ways, I find it extremely unlikely that communism will ever rule human relations at all in the future.

And "in my experience", I don't know how to reply since I don't even know about your experience or if they are ever worthy mentioning.

You can belief whatever you want to, son. The difference is being willing to look at the evidence and theory that is presented. If you want to deny something without even looking at it, that's your business.

Theory is just a theory, a scientific and profensional one, at that, but at it's core all it is is a prediction about what may or may not happen.

Come back to me when you create the world commune.

https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/subject/hist-mat/

Yes, good, you are looking for world effects. What has succeeded? You will learn nothing if you do not read.

That's the hard and fast of it.

Photoperiod - the length of day vs night - is the most important cue allowing animals to determine which season it is. As you've probably deduced by now, the pineal gland is able to measure daylength and adjust secretion of melatonin accordingly. A hamster without a pineal gland or with a lesion that prevents the pineal from receiving photoinformation is not able to prepare for the breeding season. <--- is the reason for all the FLUORIDE we're being fed

I should also add that marx was not a biblical prophet such as jesus, he got many of his preditions wrong, and he never predicted the rise in fascism.

>muh jesus
The ultimate argument destroyer

I was making a comparison to jesus being commonly believed as a prophet from god himself and marx, not muh jesus is ultimate argument destroyed u r automatically wrog

Are you aware that popularity doesn't equal correctness?

True, I could also say the same about marx and lenin.

I hope you do! But jesus didn't make a political theory predicting the future, as I am aware, did he?

Anyways, I have to wrap this up soon, it is 5:10 AM currently where I am.

Sure, bud.

Thanks for the chat.

The Star Cup is formed by the Kiss of opposites. Marriage is done and it is time to Kiss the Bride/Groom.

I feel this Kiss is right now. The EcLIPSe is the Kiss. The TwiLight. Twin Light. Twin Sun Kiss.

(I am not big on the bible so don't quote me on this) I do not believe so.

Please read Marx/Engels.

However I could argue that marx did predict that capitalism would have a catastraughic collapse.

Marx is not a messiah, just a social scientist.

True, but it proved that he was wrong in some cases, and therefore should not be treated as a god like being that was never wrong about anything.

Of course!

Marx could be wrong, no one denies this. But how accurate is his predictions? Very.

I am still yet to see capitalism falling.

Capitalism will fail too

It could take a very long time. The fundamentals is that there is conflict of interest between classes that must resolved in the futre.

just like there can only be 1 winner in Monolopy

Do you deny that different groups of people have different financial interests? How will these be resolved?

Is there an argument for it not being resolved?

There is no doubt that people have conflicting financial interest, how will this be resolved, in many, many ways this could be tackled, though I would have to argue that communism would not be the correct way to go, seeing how it turned out.

Sure, contradictions cannot last forever.

One interesting way I found that it could be tackled is what I have nicknamed pelleyism.