If they are anarchists, communist, and radical socialists who's only goal is to rebel violently against authority while looking autistic, then they are automatically a tool, not just for soros, but for all of the right wing because they destroy the left wing while believing that they are spreading communism and marxism.

This 100x

Hey, not saying it is a bad thing for my group.

*Mostly

Organised left looks like this

I have to wonder if soros starting defunding them because they act so batshit crazy that he realized that they were destroying the left wing more than helping it.

Let's be clear about our terms. Communists (Marxist-Leninit) have nothing to do with Soros.

The 'left' as you understand it, are revisionist and reactionary stooges.

The classic left I do have to give credit for how long it stood for, even if I do not agree with them and it did not turn out well in the end.

Modern leftism has mostly been reduced to a fucking joke.

🍻

Cheers to Stalin. If only he could have lived forever.

But no. Marxists believe that the tides come and go. There will be more revolutions in the future.

Heh, I still stand for private property and a free market, I just want it changed so that it cannot be manipulated and controlled into causing differences on the political scale.

The issue with capitalism is it is controlled by the jews in giant corporations who will preform actions that will cause the world to be maniupated to their will.

Hence israel, saudi arabia, soros, and more.

Capitalism always leads to exploitation and monopolies. More importantly, it creates tension in society, which has to be dealt with in some way. This implies a state which favours a ruling class, and so on and so on, only escalating the social tensions. It will never end well.

I do believen heiracrchies (In the sense that the state that rules over the population is always right).

I do not believe that corporations should control the people, rather the state should.

That depends if the hierarchy is for a purpose or goal, like the military. or if the hierarchy is an ends in itself, like a dynasty.

Certainly, in its current state, humanity needs authority to function.

But that doesn't mean it should always be this way.

Authority should be used to enlighten humanity and process it forwards.

Hmm...

Even to a point where authority will be needed less and less.

I believe that the state should always exist to unite humanity, and to provide them protection as well as help provide items such as food and water.

While also leading them on their path.

At least until something like the technological singularity occurs but that is an argument for another day.

https://twitter.com/ActualidadRT/status/877914948734767106

@Deleted User For the time being we both agree that the state is necessary. But I think a Socialist state.

http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/131827773

"Communism is unstoppable and unbeatable"

I don't know how you do it. It is extremely taxing to put up with such terrible ignorance.

Meh, after being on the internet for such a long time you just learn to tolerate it for the most part.

@Deleted User Do you want to tease out why you still defend capitalism, or should be leave it?

I do not defend capitalism at all, I believen a free market that is rid of the influences from the world and is modified so that monopolies cannot grow and cause the lives of the people to be controlled not by the state, but by the corporations they begin to live under.

The only thing I could compare it to somewhat is the US market in the 19th centuary after teddy roosevelt broke up the monopolies.

Corporate free market? Sounds like AnCap.

Hell no.

I believen a strong state that supports the hard working people that keep the country functioning, while also having a free market to provide resources to the people that are acquired through currency.

I believe that you may have misinturptired that or I did not word it properly.