For that, the world thanks you.

@BoleslawBierutLover
20 years is a long time

The Soviet army was not smart at all. Their entire battle plan was just sending so many soldiers in that they would just overrun enemy defenses.

@Deleted User Russia was an industrialising country famines are expected to happen especially when the entire world is hostile to you

The population was reduced greatly by the great war as well, I'd imagine lower population in Ukraine to begin with would affect the food need

@Deleted User The nazis intentionally starved ukranians in 1940s

One step back and the manlet commissar shoots you

@BoleslawBierutLover Do you have the evidence?

Good on the commissar then.

@Deleted User Yes, read Hitler on Leabeaursuem

Ukraine is based

Doing the Wehrmacht's job for us.

😮

@BoleslawBierutLover Is this a book?

Saturation tactics are valid. Wehrmacht still lost.

@Deleted User no but i got u

@Deleted User https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunger_Plan

@Deleted User The Germans lost because of low manpower, low industrial output (less than 200 tanks per month sort of bad), fighting multiple fronts with ground forces, and fighting Britain by air

The industrial bombings and wasting planes on the west caused the failure

The push tactic only works if it sustains

@Deleted User Explanation does not excuse poor judgement.

They wavered and the center collapsed

There's no poor judgement in a losing fight

my sources are:

Adam Tooze, The Wages of Destruction, Viking, 2007, ISBN 0-670-03826-1, pp. 476–485 and 538–549.
Jump up ^ Tooze, The Wages of Destruction, pp. 476–485 and 538–549.
Jump up ^ Tooze, The Wages of Destruction, pp. 476–485 and 538–549.
Jump up ^ Tooze, The Wages of Destruction, pp. 476–485 and 538–549.
Jump up ^ Nbg. Doc. 2718–PS, “Aktennotiz über Ergebnis der heutigen Besprechung mit den Staatssekretären über Barbarossa,” May 2, 1941, printed in International Military Tribunal, ed., Der Prozess gegen die Hauptkriegsverbrecher vor dem Internationalen Militärgerichtshof, Nürnberg, 14. November 1945–1. Oktober 1946, vol. 31. Sekretariat des Gerichtshofs, Nuremberg 1948, p. 84.
Jump up ^ Christopher Browning: The Origins of the Final Solution. The Evolution of Nazi Jewish Policy, September 1939 – March 1942. With contributions by Jürgen Matthäus. Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press and Jerusalem, Yad Vashem 2004, ISBN 0-8032-1327-1, p. 235.
Jump up ^ Alex J. Kay: Exploitation, Resettlement, Mass Murder: Political and Economic Planning for German Occupation Policy in the Soviet Union, 1940–1941. (Studies on War and Genocide, vol. 10) Berghahn Books, New York, Oxford 2006, p. 134.
Jump up ^ Gerhard, Gesine (2009). "Food and Genocide: Nazi Agrarian Politics in the Occupied Territories of the Soviet Union". Contemporary European History. 18 (1). doi:10.1017/S0960777308004827. Retrieved 7 June 2015.
Jump up ^ Tooze, The Wages of Destruction, pp. 476–485 and 538–549.
Jump up ^ On Kiev, see Karel C. Berkhoff: Harvest of Despair: Life and Death in Ukraine under Nazi Rule. Harvard University Press, Cambridge 2004, pp. 164–186.
Jump up ^ Tooze, The Wages of Destruction, pp. 476–485 and 538–549.
Jump up ^ Kay, Exploitation, Resettlement, Mass Murder, pp. 133–139; Tooze, The Wages of Destruction, pp. 476–485 and 538–549.

At that point it was a death struggle

We kicked a lot of ass beforehand though. @Deleted User

Either they took the vital cities and the Russians gave up or they lose everything

You mean to say that the poor Nazi's had no option but the fight back the world?

@Deleted User "we" also shot children in the forest

@Deleted User The Germans kicked much ass indeed with the little they had

Told France how we felt about World War One.

It's impressive

Why all the militarism and bravado then?

You Nazis were only good because of Erwin Rommel

That is bad policy.

@BoleslawBierutLover that's fine if they were communist children.

@Deleted User They were babies lmao

they were jewish children

@Deleted User

The Soviets took u guys back to ur fuckin wombs