I advocate for revolution knowing I'd be among the poor masses

Why should the masses be poor?

Why should there be a small rich class?

Actually I don't advocate for revolution but I'd be among the masses and not really be against it.

@Deleted User Society is pregnant with revolution. It is a metaphor.

Didn't get it at first.

That's what the revolution is for, to eradicate the rich

Death to the bourgeois.

>rich = bourgeois

See

That's why I despise the production class distinction

Seems like socialism is going great in venezuela, as riots are now very common in cities and the national guard are now shooting rioters on sight.

It's antequated

A prole can hoard

How is that possible

You'd think a bourgeois pig would hoard

@Deleted User >state capitalism
>socialist

ok

>everything that fails isn't mine

Here's a simple check to see if something is socialist

Venezuela didn't have a revolution. They had social reform. It doesn't work.

1. DO THE WORKERS OWN THE MEANS?

2. NO?

3. NOT SOCIALISM.

@PEWEX Try finding any "socialist" country where that happened.

USSR? China? Vietnam?

Means of production espeically now is a narrow qualification

It addresses nothing, and is too vague

The goal will never be reached that way

Stalin was the apex of practical socialism.

Not to mention Venezuela didn't even have a revolution.

>Stalinist Russia

>Workers owning anything

Hah!

@Deleted User He may have killed millions of people and preformed genocides, but at least the country lasted almost 100 years.

Moving towards socialism is just one step.

t. khrushchev

There was also an attempted coup detat a few weeks ago in venezuela where a member of the government was dropping explosives from a helicopter.

*According to the venezuelian government

A coup isn't a TRUE and HONEST revolution maaan you have to murder people for a real revolution!

>smugly implying things are what they aren't via sarcastic flawed logic to prove your point