Yet, isn't that proof in itself that anarchism cannot be achieved because you require organization to function?

>decision making
>anarchy

anarchism isn't anti organization

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

>organization
>not a state

it's anti unjustified hierarchy

Oh okay so it's not anarchy then

If there's a "just" hierarchy

you're right

because anarchy isn't anarchism

isms

some hierarchies are justified

And who determines which hierachy is "just"?

but anarchists view the state and capitalism to be unjust hierarchy

The Gangster God Computer

Some Anarcho-communists are into organization.

It's contradictory honestly

The only ancom models I've heard from ancoms are republics

They just call it an 'organization' instead of a state

Oligarchic republics usually

Because the wikipedia definition of anarchy isn't related to the actual political philosophy

But this guys are very rare.

One was a monarchist

it's not opposed to all hierarchy

just unjustified hierarchy

in which there is a subjugator and subjugated relationship and institutions in which one group exploits another

>When Anarchy isn't anarchism making the entire movement an oxymoron

pushing someone out of the road to save their life is justified

because anarchism is the name for the ideology

and has nothing to do with anarchy in the encyclopedia

An-without
archy - rule

You need a different title

anarchism- abolition of unjustified hierarchy

well, proudhon named it anarchism so

idk what to do then

call it anunjustifiedhierarchyism?

we need to kill all the disabled and the non-whites, we should also kill the stupid then we can all have the same opportunity

or

how about this

Discontentism

?