free market always show a decrease early on

One is sustainable one is not

Wow it's almost like stalinist Russia could have lasted for as long as any western nations

If he wasn't followed by a retard leader

@Timo))) didn't show much growth in China early. Only later.

Kruschev was an idiot which is why it started to collapse

Mao was his own particular type of retarded

And Lenin was a capitalist pig

@Timo))) >always

Almost as if giving that much power in the hands of few people is bound to go wrong

makes you think

Almost like capitalism creates alienation and western wages have been falling for a while

the west has more and more adopted big government

Oh wait was it not *real capitalism* that caused that

My bad

it's still capitalism, the market is simply less free now than it was

Your perfect specific version of capitalism has never been tried

My bad

No my version was implemented relatively well in multiple places

Like where

Chile

Lmao

@nazbol#9655 how dare you to speak against the holy free market and it's profits?

Singapore, Chile, 19th century U.S, Hong Kong

Chile lmao

You do realize the government monopolized the copper industry

Best south american country for only one reason

And freed the market in many other ways

And as soon as the pinochet regime collapsed everyone voted against free market

Yeah and they'll feel it

like Brazil

Almost like every Pinochet fan boy is an American who doesn't understand anything about how Chile functioned

I'm not american

Is monopolizing industries to the government capitalism

Europoor

Whatever you are

Dutch

Thing is you can do many things to free the market up, get rid of tarrifs, less taxes, no trade barriers, no subsidies for companies etc

Oh so you're probably high

A totally free market doesnt exist

Never mind I'm sorry for angering you