Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 339320789314568192


2017-07-25 08:12:52 UTC  

Now in terms of people, human beings, it's true, we are not created equal in any situation anywhere, unless we were actual clones of the same cell.

2017-07-25 08:13:08 UTC  

That is not equality. Just because something can function, does not mean it is equal. The size of planets, gravitational forces, the evolution creatures based on unequal differences and tendencies; these things are not equal but all exist within Natural ballance.

2017-07-25 08:13:24 UTC  

They all have balances of themselves

2017-07-25 08:13:31 UTC  

It's all self-similar to itself

2017-07-25 08:13:32 UTC  

Yes, but not equality.

2017-07-25 08:13:51 UTC  

Equality, so that's a very human term.

2017-07-25 08:14:05 UTC  

Definitely applies more to human beings than natural phenomena

2017-07-25 08:14:19 UTC  

A thing cannot be compared to itself. That is simply not conducive of the term "comparison".

2017-07-25 08:15:00 UTC  

Put it this way, the things that make the universe function on a vast scale are the same things that make it function on the smallest scale.

2017-07-25 08:15:02 UTC  

A thing *is*, and that is all, to compare it, is to look at another thing that simply *is*.

2017-07-25 08:15:11 UTC  

It all works the same way everywhere.

2017-07-25 08:15:58 UTC  

A different galaxy does not have different physics than ours.

2017-07-25 08:16:04 UTC  

That cannot be proven, nor disproven for that matter, therefore, that cannot be used as an arguing point, for it is of the unknown.

2017-07-25 08:16:52 UTC  

We can predict where the Andromeda galaxy is going to be in 4 billion years within a respectable margin of error.

2017-07-25 08:17:06 UTC  

It's going to be in the Milky Way.

2017-07-25 08:18:36 UTC  

Now, if it really takes this much analysis of the common tongue to discuss a man made process of economic theory, what would make it work dealing with the average man that we have already established is not created equally across the board and can therfore not be ensured an equal capability of understanding Idealism itself, and therefore, the notion of Communism?

2017-07-25 08:18:45 UTC  

The small scale ≠ large scale

2017-07-25 08:19:02 UTC  

^ bullshit.

2017-07-25 08:19:04 UTC  

And just because we know where a thing *is* does not mean we know *how* a thing is.

2017-07-25 08:19:30 UTC  

Quantum physics doesn't work the same as classical physics.

2017-07-25 08:19:40 UTC  

And let's be civil here gentlemen, no need to use profanity.

2017-07-25 08:19:59 UTC  

Quantum physics determines classical physics before classical physics even commits energy to work, son.

2017-07-25 08:20:16 UTC  

It's the smaller scale

2017-07-25 08:20:23 UTC  

It runs the larger scale.

2017-07-25 08:20:29 UTC  

It's the engine of the universe.

2017-07-25 08:20:34 UTC  

But it doesn't work like the larger scale works

2017-07-25 08:20:49 UTC  

It's like short term memory vs long term memory

2017-07-25 08:20:54 UTC  

That's because it powers the larger scale.

2017-07-25 08:20:59 UTC  

What does this have to do with Marxism

2017-07-25 08:21:02 UTC  

It's literally the math of the math.

2017-07-25 08:21:02 UTC  

Short term memory doesn't work the same as long term memory

2017-07-25 08:21:11 UTC  

It doesn't.

2017-07-25 08:21:13 UTC  

But it's the smaller scale of memory

2017-07-25 08:21:27 UTC  

It has nothing to do with Marxism, this guy just wants to talk about nothing and I don't know why I'm bothering.

2017-07-25 08:21:34 UTC  

Please gentlemen, can we get back to the topic at hand?

2017-07-25 08:21:42 UTC  

I'm not the one talking about nothing

2017-07-25 08:21:53 UTC  

You're making arguments that dont make sense

2017-07-25 08:22:00 UTC  

But acting like they do

2017-07-25 08:22:04 UTC  

I would love to discuss why Marxism can work among everyday people.

2017-07-25 08:22:11 UTC  

Please do

2017-07-25 08:22:15 UTC  

All ears.