No but they were probably likely to join regardless

they didn't have to defend Belgium

But they willingly went in a dedicated millions

You mean they didn't have a pact with Belgium

a pact from like 1830

But Belgium was an allied country so they defended it.

That's just the right thing to do.

What Germany did was kinniving and evil

What Britain did was righteous.

The right thing to do, increase the death toll and size of an already horrific war

You're brainwashed

>good goys

>bad goys

To beat back Wilhelm, yes.

it's not that simple

They're both in the wrong

Not at all.

Without Britain's intervention, Europe would be speaking German.

Again, Germany wanted domination of all of Europe.

Very much so, they both had geopolitical interests in the war, which was the predominant reason for their participation

Same intention as the Nazis.

What, you think after Russia was beaten, Germany would say "welp, that happened", and just stop murdering everyone?

They would probably conquer a large swathe of eastern european land

Germans didn't want European domination

They were going for the whole continent.

Adolf only wanted back the land Germany had pre WW1

The movements of their military prove they wanted the whole continent.

Like west Prussia

Nazi Germany wanted America speaking German.

Hitler didn't even want war, lol.

Bullshit.

Hahhahaha

Not bullshit hahaha

You guys have a bunch of weird pseudohistorical ideas

It's like history isn't actually real things that happened to you guys

Revisionism, right?

It's like you only look at it from one side

GreatestStoryNeverTold.tv

There is only one side. The side that wins.

I think he did want war, but only against the Soviet Union

this here is a nazi site but it's good infomration here: https://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/nothanks/wwr00.html