can you just point me to where the graph is validated

its 300 pages

you only need to read like the first 3

look on page 2

the introduction is just talking about mean IQ differences and standard deviations

didn't read it

it doesnt comment on the differences in distribution

@Deleted User because it prevents world revolution, fucking Trotskyites, ignoring evolution and biological realities.

yet still going with the graph argument

you want sample sizes?

@Lavabeard

@Deleted User Yep well I call it globalism

bruce

where does it point out the distribution difference in asians versus whites

it does not on page 2

I'll try and find it again

look further, it does

but what I linked you is pretty conclusive

it includes the sources of the studies and everything right there

It compares people from Hong Kong and Japan with English and Irish

asians arent even mentioned on page 2

look past page 2, you wanted more data didn't you?

@Gaelic particularism#9783 Mein kampf is like my bible

The study also found that the average IQ for African Americans was
lower than those for Latino, White, Asian, and Jewish Americans (85, 89, 103,
106, and 113, respectively;

he said its on page 2

on pae 2

thats not distribution

those are means

Whites are literally the master race basically

you want sample sizes?

hahaha

<:annoyed:266788191149752321>

you posted a graph showing a wider distribution of white IQs

I am asking *for that*

than asians

so that despite asians being higher IQ that whites have more genius level IQ people

that is the implication from the graph anyway

which so far is unsubstantiated

I've read this shit before

I just can't save it as a file or anything

so i'll look for it