Message from @Magically Delicious

Discord ID: 340656292152475658


2017-07-29 00:34:55 UTC  

Communism will never work, only National Socialism.

2017-07-29 00:35:16 UTC  
2017-07-29 00:35:32 UTC  

Neither will work. Eat it.

2017-07-29 00:35:36 UTC  

Communism will not work, just like National Socialism

2017-07-29 00:35:39 UTC  

@Deleted User praise be u

2017-07-29 00:36:03 UTC  
2017-07-29 00:36:14 UTC  

see i found you

2017-07-29 00:36:22 UTC  

As quoting Milo Yiannoplolus, "Stop fighting identity politics with identity politics."

2017-07-29 00:36:54 UTC  

gr8 b8 m8

2017-07-29 00:37:11 UTC  

But the fag isn't wrong.

2017-07-29 00:37:53 UTC  

Why would National Socialism not work

2017-07-29 00:37:58 UTC  

honest question

2017-07-29 00:39:26 UTC  

No end game. Needs enemy to exist. Success will kill it. But staying small will kill it too, too militaristic and picks too many fights. It is not sustainable.

2017-07-29 00:41:49 UTC  

It suffers the same problem as all empires. The Thousand Year Reich would literally be the best possible scenario for them. But then it would become something else, and it wouldn't be NatSoc.

2017-07-29 00:42:42 UTC  
2017-07-29 00:42:58 UTC  

@Deleted User well it failed the first time it was tried

2017-07-29 00:44:18 UTC  

Communists have better theories than NatSoc. They accept the limitations of the human scope to plan against historical forces. Commies have a clear objective, and then they, in theory, achieve their aim and walk away.

2017-07-29 00:44:39 UTC  

But those theories fall short of meeting reality, more and more as time passes.

2017-07-29 00:45:41 UTC  

Both don't work, but for different reasons.

2017-07-29 00:46:16 UTC  

They don't work because nothing works. The idea of political theory as a system of thought is fundamentally flawed.

2017-07-29 00:46:29 UTC  

@Deleted User this nigga speak the truth praise be he!

2017-07-29 00:47:22 UTC  

@Deleted User whats funny is i was debating my socialist friend, and he said Socialism has nothing to do with economics, but with preserving rights or something

2017-07-29 00:47:41 UTC  

NatSoc is mutually exclusive with war

2017-07-29 00:47:47 UTC  

Yup

2017-07-29 00:47:48 UTC  

*isn't

2017-07-29 00:47:58 UTC  

A state doesn't need war to exist

2017-07-29 00:48:09 UTC  

The way NatSoc is structured makes conflict inevitable.

2017-07-29 00:48:16 UTC  

Howcome

2017-07-29 00:48:39 UTC  

@Magically Delicious Explain how Nat Soc wont work.

2017-07-29 00:48:39 UTC  

Bravado, aggression, militaristic ideas... pretty simple.

2017-07-29 00:48:45 UTC  

so?

2017-07-29 00:48:49 UTC  

@Deleted User Scroll upi klaus

2017-07-29 00:48:51 UTC  

Aggression is a nessecity.

2017-07-29 00:48:54 UTC  

Ok, but declaring open war is different from patriotism

2017-07-29 00:48:55 UTC  

foiirugiohcnveruo;mo kt

2017-07-29 00:49:11 UTC  

Different but strong relationship.

2017-07-29 00:49:35 UTC  

A NatSoc state technically will only ever encompass it's own people anyway

2017-07-29 00:49:46 UTC  

Exactly

2017-07-29 00:49:59 UTC  

That's part of the antagonism.

2017-07-29 00:50:04 UTC  

so not unless there are millions of people from the same ethnicity living somewhere else

2017-07-29 00:50:07 UTC  

they won't declare war