Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 340846562689286144


2017-07-29 13:09:12 UTC  

or multiculturalism

2017-07-29 13:12:58 UTC  

When did the liberal become dissatisfied with the world being multicultural? When did man decide it needed to be micromanaged into ethno nations?

2017-07-29 13:14:23 UTC  

There is unarguably a first, a start to this, but Im not sure what government sponsored attempts at it before the rest

2017-07-29 13:14:49 UTC  

you're not sure how the government would combat multiculturalism?

2017-07-29 13:16:01 UTC  

No im not sure what government started the concept

2017-07-29 13:16:57 UTC  

Probably go with America or Britain

2017-07-29 13:17:49 UTC  

Maybe France

2017-07-29 13:18:12 UTC  

US was one of the last nations to outlaw slavery, and our non euro immigration never began i
En masse until after ww2 and when our economy boomed, economic migrants just like the africans headed to EU now

2017-07-29 13:18:38 UTC  

Multiculturalism became policy in the 70s I think

2017-07-29 13:18:47 UTC  

Can back this up with statistics too

2017-07-29 13:20:02 UTC  

Well the White Australia Policy was dismantled in the 60s

2017-07-29 13:20:34 UTC  

then in the 70s under the Fraser government, refugees from the Vietnam war were introduced

2017-07-29 13:20:37 UTC  

So the civil rights movement is around the time the multicultural attitude blossomed?

2017-07-29 13:20:52 UTC  

Not sure about America, i'm talking about Australia here

2017-07-29 13:20:59 UTC  

But I think the 70s was the time when it began

2017-07-29 13:21:15 UTC  

and the 90s when the sort of politics we see today started to birth

2017-07-29 13:21:21 UTC  

identity politics, green politics etc

2017-07-29 13:21:47 UTC  

Britain since after WW2 has accepted quite a few Indians and blacks

2017-07-29 13:21:53 UTC  

for whatever reason into their society

2017-07-29 13:22:26 UTC  

Im assuming government decision initially and not that of the people

2017-07-29 13:22:33 UTC  

Definitely

2017-07-29 13:22:54 UTC  

And it just gradually grew over time and evolved into allowing a considerable amount of cultures into the country

2017-07-29 13:23:03 UTC  

with a complete disregard of regulating their assimilation

2017-07-29 13:23:13 UTC  

as it was probably deemed racist or unnecessary

2017-07-29 13:24:10 UTC  

People at the time of the conception of multiculturalism were speaking out against it

2017-07-29 13:24:50 UTC  

Of course they didn't have any say in it and their protest didn't effect the decision

2017-07-29 13:24:54 UTC  

look up Enoch Powell

2017-07-29 13:25:18 UTC  

influential British Nationalist who forsaw the effects of multiculturalism which we enjure today

2017-07-29 13:25:42 UTC  

He was removed from his position in parliament when he gave his speech against it

2017-07-29 13:27:21 UTC  

They did polls at the time on peoples views on his speech against multiculturalism

2017-07-29 13:27:32 UTC  

and I think it was about 70-80% against Multiculturalism

2017-07-29 13:27:40 UTC  

which is fairly extraordinary

2017-07-29 13:28:07 UTC  

Because of course the establishment took no care in the world about the peoples views and to this day the policy has continued

2017-07-29 13:28:52 UTC  

I think personally they continue it purely because of economic reasons with an utter disregard to it's effects on culture, values and the native society

2017-07-29 13:29:02 UTC  

as it allows for continued GDP growth

2017-07-29 13:29:16 UTC  

and introduces more potential workers

2017-07-29 13:29:34 UTC  

although it comes at the loss of the workers who already live here

2017-07-29 13:29:52 UTC  

lowering the wages as companies don't have to compete for workers anymore

2017-07-29 13:32:41 UTC  

So to summarise, it almost definitely comes at the individuals loss in the long and short term, but benefits the collective in the long run

2017-07-29 13:33:34 UTC  

It's quite frankly quantity over quality

2017-07-29 13:36:58 UTC  

collective over the individual