Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 341013164663635969


2017-07-30 00:19:27 UTC  

mostly because leftism is incompatible with open discussion

2017-07-30 00:19:31 UTC  

@Deleted User basically this

2017-07-30 00:19:34 UTC  

Not true

2017-07-30 00:19:36 UTC  

@Mimic King#0692

2017-07-30 00:19:39 UTC  

Not here. I will openly take your best slander.

2017-07-30 00:19:50 UTC  

And what's a leftist

2017-07-30 00:19:56 UTC  

that is true of all ideology

2017-07-30 00:20:05 UTC  

What is a leftist

2017-07-30 00:20:08 UTC  

I'd like to see a communist defend the holocaust lie

2017-07-30 00:20:21 UTC  

I'd also like to see a marxist actually defend marxism

2017-07-30 00:20:43 UTC  

I have no interest to. But Auschwitz did not have the infrastructure to gas millions of people. This is true.

2017-07-30 00:20:52 UTC  

I can defend Marxism if you want.

2017-07-30 00:21:06 UTC  

Do you believe Marxism is scientific?

2017-07-30 00:21:23 UTC  

That's the goal.

2017-07-30 00:21:37 UTC  

How can it be scientific if it makes no falsifiable assertions?

2017-07-30 00:22:36 UTC  

Historical materialism and dialectical materialism are both falsifiable.

2017-07-30 00:23:14 UTC  

We can start with materialism first, if you want.

2017-07-30 00:23:22 UTC  

More broadly.

2017-07-30 00:23:55 UTC  

Then hone in onto the falsifiable of Marx's theory on society and the material world.

2017-07-30 00:24:00 UTC  

Where do you want to start?

2017-07-30 00:24:34 UTC  

What do you think falsifiable actually means?

2017-07-30 00:24:45 UTC  

Give me an example of a falsifiable hypothesis

2017-07-30 00:24:55 UTC  

and explain why it's falsifiable

2017-07-30 00:25:32 UTC  

Every scientific theory must be falsifiable, which means, able to be disproved.

2017-07-30 00:25:55 UTC  

Again, when you say explain why **it's** falsifiable, which theory do you mean?

2017-07-30 00:26:08 UTC  

Marxism is not a single theory.

2017-07-30 00:26:31 UTC  

I just mean generally, give me a hypothetical hypothesis that illustrates falsifiability

2017-07-30 00:26:36 UTC  

just so I know you understand the concept

2017-07-30 00:27:18 UTC  

Sure. Evolution for example could be falsified if it was found that mutations did not occur. It would disprove natural selection.

2017-07-30 00:27:43 UTC  

Ok, so you've failed in two spectacular ways

2017-07-30 00:27:46 UTC  

@Deleted User historical materialism is explained by dialectical materialism. So it is a single theory.

2017-07-30 00:28:05 UTC  

One is that lack of evidence is never what falsifies a statement

2017-07-30 00:28:27 UTC  

@Firefly#9983 They are interrelated, but it is hard to explain it to a complete newbie.

2017-07-30 00:28:31 UTC  

@Deleted User Yeah, apparently Holocaust revisioning started amongst the left-wing French circles is what I was told on the main leftypol discord.

2017-07-30 00:28:39 UTC  

Might be related to huge anti-zionism and etc.

2017-07-30 00:29:17 UTC  

@National Trotskyist you know what else I find hilarious is that ethnonationalism was one of the primary platforms of the Soviet system

2017-07-30 00:29:52 UTC  

@Mimic King#0692 I never said that a lack of evidence was the same as being disprovable, at all. Falsifiable means that a discovery can be made that makes a hypothesis untenable, like my example shows clearly.

2017-07-30 00:30:01 UTC  

I find it hilarious because both holocaust revisionism and ethnonationalism are considered FASCIST NAZISM by the nu-left but are really classically leftist positions

2017-07-30 00:30:17 UTC  

@Deleted User one is based on another. It is a specific relation. It is just different areas. Logic is more abstract theory. But is united with less.

2017-07-30 00:30:38 UTC  

but you're wrong @Deleted User

2017-07-30 00:30:52 UTC  

a lack of evidence is never what shows that a hypothesis is untenable