Might be related to huge anti-zionism and etc.

@National Trotskyist you know what else I find hilarious is that ethnonationalism was one of the primary platforms of the Soviet system

@Mimic King#0692 I never said that a lack of evidence was the same as being disprovable, at all. Falsifiable means that a discovery can be made that makes a hypothesis untenable, like my example shows clearly.

I find it hilarious because both holocaust revisionism and ethnonationalism are considered FASCIST NAZISM by the nu-left but are really classically leftist positions

@Deleted User one is based on another. It is a specific relation. It is just different areas. Logic is more abstract theory. But is united with less.

but you're wrong @Deleted User

a lack of evidence is never what shows that a hypothesis is untenable

@Firefly#9983 Okay, thanks for the correction. Maybe I should just focus on materialism first.

I don't see that in his post as all.

What he said hasn't got anything to do with a lack of evidence 😒

@Mimic King#0692
>a lack of evidence is never what shows that a hypothesis is untenable
I agree with you! How am I not clear?

for a hypothesis to be falsifiable, there must be a condition whereby evidence to support the claim CAN be discovered

So saying that "lack of fossils" would falsify evolution and natural selection is completely nonsensical

"Falsifiable means that a discovery can be made that makes a hypothesis untenable"
That's what I said numbnuts.

Right, meaning, contravening evidence, not a LACK of evidence

EXACTLY

a lack of evidence just means the hypothesis is unproven

🤔

it doesn't mean the hypothesis is unfalsifiable

so, you're confused

And i never mentions fossils, I mentioned mutations.

No, you are confused.

Your script broke.

GG.

Haha

mutations, whatever

@Deleted User materialism is not very agile. It needs dialectics to function properly. Many materialist are less agile than even some idealists.

it's not a lack of mutations what would falsify evolution

you're still wrong in either case

because you don't actually understand falsifiability yet

I know, but if mutations where show to not occur, this was discovered, it would falsify evolution.

again, you're completely confused on falsifiability

what you're saying is that a lack of mutations would leave the theory of evolution UNSUBSTANTIATED

@Firefly#9983 Hmm, I will have to think of a good way to communicate historical and dialectical materialism is a single way. Or not! When I feel like it.

that doesn't mean it would be unfalsifiable or falsifiable based on a lack of mutations

I don't think you understand evolution, then.

I understand it just fine, you just don't understand what falsifiability is

@Deleted User is hard man.

Sorry, I'm a retard, Marx is a retard, the holocaust never happened, and I want to stroke your penis.

For the evolutionary hypothesis to be falsifiable, there must exist a plausible observable condition that would prove it's existtence, which it has, thereofre the hypothesis is falsifiable